摘要
文论危机或者失语是在1980年代末期就已经提出、并迅速获得基本共识,此后一直是被反复讨论的热点话题,为了摆脱由于对西方话语的习惯性依赖所造成的能指浮泛与所指错位,恢复文论研究的阐释能效,学界提出了返回现实、转换古代思想资源等途径,但却始终未能取得有效的成果。所以如此,乃在于主体性不足或者空缺。在生命感知、文化浸润与现实关注的场域中重建话语的主体性,才可能获得面对西方、古代以及现实的第一人称视角,致力于理论的吸收与创造。
The crisis or aphasia in the study of Chinese literary theory was a hot topic that had been raised in the late 1980 s and quickly gained a basic consensus and had been repeatedly discussed since. In order to get rid of the accusations of habitual dependence on Western discourse which caused signifier overflow and secondhand signified,and restoration of literary theory of interpretation efficiency,the academic community advised to return to reality,or to convert the classic resources into modern language,and other means. But all of them haven't been able to achieve effective results by now. In my opinion,I think it is the lack of subjectivity. So,this state in study in literary theory would be changed by reconstructing the subjectivity with comprehending existence,studying native culture and back to the reality
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2017年第8期58-64,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
基金
国家社科基金重大项目"20世纪西方文论中的中国问题"(16ZDA194)的阶段性成果
关键词
文论危机
中西文论对话
主体性
crisis of literary theory
dialogue of literary theory between western and China
subjectivity
