摘要
文章通过对近7年来施某某等人聚众斗殴案处理效果的持续追踪和社会各界对施案的各种关注进行深入分析后认为,聚众斗殴罪虽属于复行为犯,但本案既有聚众行为又有斗殴行为,因而是既遂;主观违法要素上,流氓罪分解而来的四个罪名不需要无一例外地继承其“母罪”的流氓动机,且认定本案不具备“私仇或争霸一方”的“此动机”并未否认其“逞强耍横”的“彼动机”,因此主客观相一致,应当认定成立聚众斗殴罪。检察机关决定对施某某等人作相对不起诉前后,始终遵循法律的边界指引和刑事政策的目的引导,通过充分的情势预判,创造性地输出让公民'信法而不至于去信访'的典型案例,对传统文化浓郁的石狮市当地民众逐步建立对法治和司法的内心认同与实践偏好,产生了深远的影响,对全国检察机关办理群体性事件引发的案件也具有引领和示范作用。
Through the analysis of all kinds of attention and various social concerns for the past seven years on Shi etc.affray case,this paper considers that although the crime of affray is guilty of multiple acts,but it has accomplished because it has both the crowd behavior and the behavior of fighting.On the Subjective elements of the law,the four charges decomposed from the Rogue crime are unwanted without exception to inherit the rogue motive,and cognize that the case does not have the motivation of private or hegemony doesn't deny the other motivation that“they try to be brave”.Therefore,the subjective and objective are consistent,thus,the establishment of Affray should be recognized.The procuratorial organ has always followed the legal boundary guidelines and the purpose of criminal policy guidance around the decision to make the relative non-prosecution,and creatively output the typical case to allow citizens to“trust law and not to go to the petition".
出处
《刑法论丛》
CSSCI
2018年第1期335-356,共22页
Criminal Law Review
关键词
聚众斗殴
复行为犯
主观违法要素
相对不起诉
Affrays Crime
Complex behavior
Subjective illegal elements
Relative non-prosecuting
