4Benninger M S. EDITORIAL Making the peer review process work. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006,134 ( 1 ) :1-2
5Balistreri W F. EDITORIALS Landmarks, landmines, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts. J Pediatr, 2007, 151 (2) : 107-108
6Callaham ML, Knopp RK, Gallagher EJ. Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews. JAMA, 2002, 287 (21) :2781-2783
7Jefferson T, Wager E, Davidoff F. Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. JAMA, 2002, 287 (21) :2786-2790
8van Rooyen S, Black N, Godlee F. Development of the review quality instrument (RQI) for assessing peer reviews of manuscripts. J Clin Epidemiol, 1999,52(7) :625-629
