摘要
在讨论世界的本原和逻辑起点问题上 ,自然哲学家的观点表明 ,他们实际上走的是从经验到一般的认识路线。而柏拉图则是从一般到事实 ,通过“理念论” ,论证了知识普遍必然性和客观有效性的客观依据 ,解决了“知识何以可能”的逻辑前提。
On the problem of discussing the world-arche and the starting point of logic,the opinion of natural philosophers demonstrated they abided by the cognitive line from experience to generality.While Plato followed the cognitive line from generality to fact,by means of idealism,verified the foundation of universality and necessity and objective effectiveness,solved the logical premise why knowledge is possible.
出处
《东方论坛（青岛大学学报）》
2003年第2期24-27,共4页
Eastern Forum（JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY）
