期刊文献+

不同全麻药对小鼠周围神经电生理的影响 被引量:6

EFFECT OF THE VARIOUS ANESTHETIC DRUGS ON THE FUNCTION OF PERIPHERAL SENSORY AND MOTOR NERVES IN MOUSE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨全麻药对小鼠周围运动神经和感觉神经的影响。方法:将50只小鼠分为5组,分别是用α-氯醛糖、戊巴比妥钠、氨基甲酸乙酯、水合氯醛、氯胺酮进行腹腔麻醉后,测定坐骨神经感觉神经动作电位(SNAP)和腓肠肌复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP),并比较其潜伏期、波幅、传导速度。结果:氯胺酮组的SNAP和CMAP的传导速度都最快,而α-氯醛糖组的SNAP的潜伏期、波幅、传导速度都最差。结论:在实验性研究或临床应用周围神经电生理检测时,选用氯胺酮或戊巴比妥钠麻醉较为理想。 Objectives: To explore the effect of the various anesthetic drugs on the funtion of peripheral sensory and motor nerves in mouse. Methods: 50 mice were divided into 5 groups and each group was injected with different anesthetic drug (α - chloralose, pentobarbital, urethane, chloral hydrate and ketamine) . After anesthesia, their sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) of sciatic nerves and compound muscle action potential ( CMAP) of gastrocnemius muscles were detected by an electrophysiological recorder. Results: The ketamine had the quickest conductive velocity of the SNAP and the CMAP in the five anesthetic drugs: while the α - chloralose had the lowest conductive velocity of the SNAP and the CMAP in the five anesthetic druge. Conclusion: The ketamine is a better anesthetic drug in investigating and determining the function of peripheral nerves.
出处 《现代电生理学杂志》 2003年第2期78-80,共3页 Journal of Modern Electrophysiology
关键词 全麻药 小鼠 周围神经 电生理检测 运动神经 感觉神经 peripheral nerve anaesthetic drugs electrophysiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

  • 1[2]Berry CM. The eleclrical activity of regenerating nerves in eat [J].neurophysysiol. 1944, 7 (1): 103~112.
  • 2[4]sanders DB. clinical neurophysiology ofdisorders of the neuromuscular junction. clia. Neurophysiol. 1993, 10: 167~180.

同被引文献43

  • 1张逢辉,杨立伟,白世祥,国建飞.胸外科手术致腋神经损伤四例[J].中华创伤杂志,2005,21(12):906-906. 被引量:2
  • 2钟伟邦,武兆忠,郭露萍,张永建,任海红,陈军初,符柳江,刘敏.三种常用动物实验麻醉药对小白鼠麻醉效果比较分析[J].中国煤炭工业医学杂志,2006,9(6):633-634. 被引量:18
  • 3张栋.不同麻醉药对大鼠麻醉效果的比较[J].实验动物科学,2007,24(1):19-20. 被引量:28
  • 4孙敬方.动物实验方法学Dvq.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.192.196.
  • 5孙敬方.动物实验方法学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004,400-401.
  • 6张逢辉,杨立伟,白世祥,等.胸外科手术致腋神经损伤4例.中华刨伤杂志,2005,21(12):906.
  • 7Gugino LD, Romero JR, Aglio L, et al. Transeranial magnetic stim- ulation coregistered with MRI : a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials. Clin Neurophysiol, 2001, 112(10) : 1781-1792.
  • 8Nijhuis TH, Smits ES, van Neck JW, et al. Ultrasound-guided nee- die positioning near the sciatic nerve to elicit compound muscle action potentials from the gastrocnemius muscle of the rat. J Neurosci Meth- ods, 2011, 194(2):283-286.
  • 9Yan JG, Eldridge MP, Dzwierzynski WW, et al. Intraoperative elec- trophysiological studies to predict the efflcacy of neurolysis after nerve injury:experiment in rats. Hand, 2008, 3(3) :257-262.
  • 10Cappelen-Smith C, Lin CS, Kuwabara S, et al. Conduction block during and after ischaemia in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain, 2002, 125(Pt 8) : 1850-1858.

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部