期刊文献+

高龄非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者冠状动脉内支架术疗效 被引量:5

Early and Late Outcomes After Elective Coronary Stenting in Elderly Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :观察 75岁以上非ST段抬高急性冠状动脉 (冠脉 )综合征患者选择性冠脉内支架术的安全性和远期预后。  方法 :连续 3 2 3例行选择性冠脉内支架术的非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者 ,其中≥ 75岁患者 79例为高龄组 ,<75岁患者 2 44例为对照组。比较两组患者手术结果和远期预后。  结果 :两组支架术成功率和手术并发症率差异无显著性。随访期内 ,两组心绞痛复发、硝酸酯类药物停用、再入院、心功能改善、再次血运重建和病死率均无显著性差异 ,但高龄组心脏事件发生率较对照组显著减少 (15 7%vs .2 8 7% ,P =0 0 2 9)。多因素分析显示 ,年龄不是非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者远期心脏事件的独立预测因素。  结论 :高龄非ST段抬高急性冠脉综合征患者选择性冠脉内支架术有良好的疗效和安全性 ,远期心脏事件发生率较年轻患者少。 Objective: To investigate the initial and long-term outcomes after coronary stenting in patients aged ≥75 years with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome(ACS). Methods: Three hundred twenty-three consecutive patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS underwent elective coronary stenting, including 79 patients aged ≥75 years (group A) and 244 patients aged <75 years (group B). The initial results and long-term follow-up outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: Procedural success rate (93.7% vs. 96.3%) and complications (3.8% vs. 2.5%) were similar between the two groups (all p>0.05). There were no significant differences in recurrent angina, cessation of nitrates, re-admission, and improvement of cardiac function between the two groups (all p>0.05) during the follow-up period. Although differences of revascularization (14.3% vs. 23.9%) and mortality (1.4% vs. 3.0%) were not significant between the two groups (all p>0.05), occurrence rate of major adverse cardiac events was lower in group A than that in group B (15.7% vs. 28.7%, p=0.029). Multivariate analysis showed that age was not an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events. Conclusion: Elective coronary stenting in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS is safe and efficacious. Moreover, elderly patients may have fewer cardiac events than younger ones.
出处 《中国循环杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2003年第3期188-190,共3页 Chinese Circulation Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coil Cardiol,2000, 36: 970-1062.
  • 2Shen WF, Zhang RY, Shen Y, et al. Optimal timing for coronary stenting in unstable angina. Chin Med J, 2001, 114: 59-61.
  • 3Fragmin and fast revascularisation during instability in coronary artery disease investigators. Invasive compared with non-invasive treatment in unstable coronaryartery disease: FRISC Ⅱ prospective randomised multicentre study.Lancet, 1999, 354: 708-715.
  • 4Cannon CP, Weintraub WS, Demopoulos LA, et al. Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein H b/Ⅲ a inhibitor tirofiban. N Engl J Med,2001, 344: 1879-1887.
  • 5Ronner E, Boersma E, Laarman GJ, et al. Early angioplasty in acute coronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation improves outcome but increases the need for six-month repeat revascularization: an analysis of the PURSUIT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002, 39: 1924-1929.
  • 6Boden WE, McKay RG. Optimal treatment of acute coronary syndromes-an evolving strategy. N Engl J Med, 2001, 344: 1939-1942.
  • 7Kleiman NS, Lincoff AM, Flaker GC, et al. Early percutaneous coronary intervention, platelet inhibition with eptifibatide, and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes. PURSUIT Investigators. Circulation,2000, 101: 751-757.
  • 8Stone PH, Thompson B, Zaret BL, et al. Factors associated with failure of medical therapy in patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction: a TIMI Ⅲ B database study. Eur Heart J, 1999, 20: 1084-1093.

同被引文献33

  • 1Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, et al. ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines(committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2002,40(7):1366.
  • 2De Servi S, Cavallini C, Dellavalle A, et al, Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome in the elderly: trearlment strategies and 30-day outcome [J]. Am Heart J, 2004,147(5) :830.
  • 3Kilo J, Czemy M, Zimpfer D, et al. Predictors of perioperative mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly [J]. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2003,51 ( 1 ) :33.
  • 4Hart JC. A review of 140 octopus off-pump bypass patients over the age of seventy: procedure of choice ? [ J]. Heart Surg Forum, 2001,4 (Suppl 1 ) :S24.
  • 5[1]Rasche H. Haerrostroscas and thrombosis an overview Eur Heart J, 2001, S (SUPP 1 Q):Q3
  • 6[2]Badimonl, Vilahur G, Sanchez S, et al.Atherornatousp laquefomnation and thrombogenesis: for marion, rist factors and therapeutic approaches, Ear Heart J,2001,3(supp 1 Ⅰ): 116
  • 7[4]The Joint European Society of Cardology American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocrdial redefined Euro Heard J,2000,21:1 502
  • 8[5]ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management Patients With Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart.Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2000,102:1 216
  • 9[6]Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management or patients with acute myocardial infarction: 1999 update: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Tadk force on Practce Guidelines. Available at WWW. org( webversion)
  • 10[7]Dixon SR, Q Neill WW, Interrention in acute myuocardial infarction Curr Probl cardiol, 2001, 26(10):619

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部