摘要
[目的/意义]高校"双一流"建设要求有一流的科研成果。图书馆参与科学评价顶级学术成果,助力"双一流"的建设,可为科学决策提供辅助支持。[方法/过程]文章聚焦"Nature"周刊上有关基因编辑技术的论文,计算Altmetrics指标的覆盖率;引入学科归一化影响因子,分析FWCI、AAS、被引频次的关系,探讨高网络参与度论文与高引用论文之间是否有关联,分析顶级期刊论文的网络参与度,检验Wikipedia指标进行科研成果评价的有效性。[结果/结论]研究发现:Twitter,Mendeley,news story具有较高的指标覆盖率,高网络参与度论文非高引用论文,AAS对高引用论文的预测作用并不明确,FWCI和引文表征的是学者间的学术影响。Scopus对"Nature"的论文选择性收录,Wikipedia具有科普特性,但Wikipedia指标覆盖率较低,用于科学评价尚不成熟。
[Purpose/significance]The construction of'Double World-class'in universities requires first-class scientific research.Libraries can participate in the scientific evaluation of the top academic achievements,help to build the'Double Worldclass'construction,and provide ancillary decision-making support.[Method/process]This study focuses on'gene edit technology'papers in'Nature'Weekly,and calculates the coverage rate of different Altmetrics indicators.By introducing the influencing factor of disciplinary normalization,the paper analyzes the relationship between Field Weighted Citation Impact(FWCI),AAS and citation counts,probes into the correlation between high network participation papers and high cited papers,discusses the online-engagement degree of top academic papers,and examines the validity of Wikipedia indicator for the evaluation of research outputs.[Result/conclusion]Twitter,Mendeley,news story have high coverage rate,high online-engaged papers are not highly cited papers,the prediction effect of AAS on highly cited papers is not clear,FWCI and citation represent the academic influence of scholars.Scopus selectively indexes'Nature'papers,and Wikipedia has the characteristic of scientific popularization,but the indicators’coverage rate of Wikipedia is low,so the usage of Wikipedia for evaluation of scientific research is still immature.
出处
《情报理论与实践》
CSSCI
北大核心
2019年第2期80-86,共7页
Information Studies:Theory & Application
基金
2016年南开大学亚洲研究中心资助项目"高品质科技期刊的Altmetrics分析"(项目编号:AS1606)
2016年度国家社会科学基金重点项目"网络时代开放教育资源引进与利用中的知识产权问题研究"(项目编号:16ATQ002)的成果
关键词
学术论文
补充计量学
自然
实证研究
特征分析
academic paper
Altmetrics
Nature
empirical study
characteristics analysis