期刊文献+

痔上黏膜环行切除术与Milligan-Morgan术对Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔治疗的比较 被引量:3

Comparison of treatments for hemorrhoid between PPH and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :对痔上黏膜环行切除术 (PPH)和Milligan -Morgan术治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔的临床效果进行比较。方法 :将 5 7例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度痔随机分为PPH组 (2 7例 )和Milligan -Morgan组 (30例 ) ,分别进行手术治疗。对比分析手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后疼痛等。结果 :与Milligan -Morgan组比较 ,PPH组的手术时间及住院时间短 ,术中出血少 ,术后疼痛轻。结论 :PPH在治疗Ⅲ、Ⅳ度脱垂性痔的近期疗效明显优于Milligan -Morgan术。 Aim: To compare the short-term effect between the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: 57 patients with third or fourth stage hemorrhoidal prolapse were randomly assigned to PPH group (n=27) and Milligan-Morgan group (n=30). Data of operating time, pain index, blood loss in operation, and length of hospital stay after operation, etc were analyzed. Results: The PPH group comparing with Milligan-Morgan group had shorter operating time and hospital stay, less pain index and less blood loss in operation. Conclusion: The PPH is a safe and effective way for third or fourth stage hemorrhoidal prolapse and its short-term effect is better than that of Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.
出处 《暨南大学学报(自然科学与医学版)》 CAS CSCD 2003年第4期41-45,共5页 Journal of Jinan University(Natural Science & Medicine Edition)
关键词 痔上粘膜环行切除术 手术 PPH hemorrhoids Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1赵江宁,任东林,张思奋.Ⅲ,Ⅳ度痔的PPH治疗[J].广东医学,2001,22(12):1095-1097. 被引量:15
  • 2张东铭.肛门部的血管配布[J].中国肛肠病杂志,1986,6(2):3-3.
  • 3LONGO A. Treatment of hemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure[R]. Rome, Italy: Proceedings of the 6 th. World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery,1998.
  • 4THOMSON W H. The nature of hemorrhoids[J].Br J Surg, 1975, 62:542-552.
  • 5SHAFIK A. A concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and physiology of defecation. Hemorrhoidal venous plexuses : anatomy and role in homorrhoidal[ J ]. Coloproctology, 1985, 5 : 291 - 295.

二级参考文献4

  • 1任东林 吴佐周 等.PPH与Milligan-Morgan手术治疗Ⅲ°-Ⅳ°痔的比较研究.第八届全国中西医结合合肛肠病学术会议大肠肛门病论文汇编(杭州)[M].-,2001.40-41.
  • 2任东林,第八届全国中西医结合肛肠病学术会议大肠肛门病论文汇编,2001年,40页
  • 3张东铭.痔的现代概念[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2001,4(1):58-60. 被引量:197
  • 4姚礼庆,唐竞,孙益红,戈少云,陆维琪,刘厚宝,张波.经吻合器治疗重度痔的临床应用价值(附36例报告)[J].中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(5):288-289. 被引量:320

共引文献18

同被引文献34

  • 1程远峰,罗红杰,侯雪凌,马志勇,李培生,于成海.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗环状痔15例[J].人民军医,2005,48(2):88-89. 被引量:1
  • 2林玲莉,岑嘉云,胡立波.PPH结合痔切除与开放式外剥内扎术治疗环状混合痔的对比研究[J].中国临床医学,2005,12(6):1058-1060. 被引量:18
  • 3痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2128
  • 4姚礼庆.吻合器黏膜环切术治疗重度痔的临床价值.中国实用外科杂志,2001,21(5):289-289.
  • 5喻德洪,主编.现代肛肠外科学.第 1版.北京 :人民军医出版社,1997.191.
  • 6Longo A.Treatment of hemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosa and hemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device:a new procedure.Proceedings of the 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery.Rome,Italy,1998.3-6.
  • 7Ganio E,Altomare DF,Gabrilli F.Prospective randomized multicentretrial comparing stapled with open hemorrhoidectomy[J].Br J Surg,2001,88(5):669-674.
  • 8Seow-Choen F.Stapled haemorrhoidectomy:pain or gain[J].Br J Surg,2001,88(1):1-3.
  • 9Pescatori M.Pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy[J].Lancet,2000,356:2188.
  • 10Shalaby R,Desoky A.Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Mi-lligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy[J].Br J Srug,2001,88(8):1049-1053.

引证文献3

二级引证文献80

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部