摘要
认罪认罚的自愿性是相对的,具有不同层次、情态和类型。认罪认罚的自愿性既不同于认罪认罚的真实性、明知性、合法性,亦有别于有罪供述的自愿性。认罪认罚的自愿性可以确保程序从简的合法性,增强程序从宽的正当性,强化实体从宽的合理性,并提高有罪供述的真实性。试点地区通过一段时间的探索,已经在自愿性的审查和保障方面取得了一定的成效,但仍然存在自愿性审查形式化、法律帮助效果不佳等问题。从长远来看,选择以权利抗衡与权力保障相结合,而以权利抗衡为主的自愿性审查与保障模式是大势所趋,但受强制性刑事取供机制及刑事诉讼构造的制约,在很长的一段时间内,“权力保障模式”依然会占主导地位。
The voluntariness of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty is relative and can be divided into different levels and types. It is clearly different from the authenticity, knowingness or legality of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty,and is other than the voluntariness of confession. The voluntariness of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty can make sure of the legality of simplifying procedure, increase the righteousness of procedural leniency, strengthen the rationality of substantive leniency and enhance the authenticity of confession. In the pilot regions of Giving Leniency for Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty,the guarantee system of the voluntariness of Pleading Guilty and Accepting Penalty has not been fully developed while it has been taking into practice to some extent. It has been an irresistible trend to construct a voluntariness review and guarantee mode which mainly based on right check and balance mechanism in the long run.However, in China, owing to the restriction of the mandatory interrogation mechanism and the criminal procedure Structure,Power Care Model will occupy a leading position for a long time to come.
出处
《人大法律评论》
CSSCI
2018年第1期169-198,共30页
Renmin University Law Review
基金
国家社科基金一般项目“认罪认罚从宽制度实施程序研究”(15BFX072)的阶段性成果
关键词
认罪认罚
自愿性
保障模式
深层障碍
完善
Pleading guilty and accepting penalty
Voluntariness
The mode of guarantee
Deep obstacle
Perfection
