摘要
回顾了假设思维及后悔研究中的实验研究和现场研究的结果及相互之间的矛盾 ,总结先前研究对“做 /不做”这对概念的界定。在探讨“做 /不做”这对概念的不足后 ,作者用“状态改变 /状态继续”来替代“做 /不做”。在“状态改变 -状态继续”框架基础上将事件分为“整体事件”和“分段事件”。研究证实“做 /不做”只适合于“整体事件”而不适合“分段事件”。“状态改变 -状态继续”效应的提出改变了先前研究思路 ,并扩大了标准理论的解释能力 ,将“做 -不做”效应和“特例 -常规”效应整合成“状态改变 -状态继续”效应。同时 。
This article reriewed conflictions between experimental studies and field resear ch on conterfactual thinking, and replaced action/inaction with change of state/ status quo due to its shortcomings of action and inaction. Unitary events were d istinguished from divided events under the framework of change of state-status quo. It was approved that action/inaction is only applied to unitary events but not to divided events. This conceptual framework of change of state effect adds to the power of norm theory (Kahneman and Miller, 1986) and incorporate their re ception effect and action effect into one change of state effect. On the other h and, this framework also partly explains the long-lasting differences between scenario experiment and field research on regret and counterfactual thinking .
出处
《心理学报》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2003年第5期701-710,共10页
Acta Psychologica Sinica
关键词
状态改变/状态继续
做/不做
整体事件/分段事件
假设思维
change of state/status quo,action/inaction,unitary event/divided event, counterfactual thinking.
