摘要
“核心期刊”的遴选无疑属于应用研究的范畴,如果应用价值不大,反而滋生出诸多负面效应,其存在的意义和研究价值就值得怀疑。“核心期刊”的概念及相关理论传入我国之后,吸引了一大批学者的参与,也吸引了众多的组织、部门为之“奔走呼号”,耗费的人力、物力、财力难以计量。但从实际效用来看,“核心期刊”本来就十分有限的功能,非但没有得到很好的发挥,却不断泛化、异化,负面效应孳生、蔓延,是典型的“得不偿失”和明显的“弊大于利”。
Selection of 'core journals', an event of applied research, would end up with negative effects and its justification for existence ought to be questioned if it failed to yield any practical value. After they were introduced into China, the idea of 'core journals' and the related theory attracted not only a considerable number of scholars but also numerous organizations and departments, who cheered to it and wasted countless human power, materials and money on them. In terms of effect, the limited number of functions of 'core journals' not only failed to be brought into full play, but were constantly generalized and alienated, leading to the negative effects to grow and spread. The 'core journals' phenomenon was a typical example of 'cost surpassing gains' and 'harms exceeding good'.
出处
《江苏大学学报（社会科学版）》
2003年第3期128-132,共5页
Journal of Jiangsu University(Social Science Edition)
基金
江苏省教育厅人文社会科学基金(02SJB860001)
关键词
核心期刊
期刊评价
论文评价
core journals
journal evaluation
paper assessment
