摘要
目的:分析抢救急性心肌梗死患者中急诊急救护理的作用。方法:选取2016年6月-2017年6月我院180例急性心肌梗死患者,将其随机分为对照组和试验组,每组90例。对照组患者采用常规护理模式,试验组患者给予急诊急救护理路径进行干预。统计两组患者护理后球囊扩张时间、心肌梗死复发情况、病死率等临床指标,并针对患者的护理结果满意状况和临床疗效进行评分。结果:试验组球囊扩张时间为(76.48±12.05)min,心肌梗死复发7例(7%);对照组球囊扩张时间为(122.4±15.84)min,心肌梗死复发32例(32%);试验组患者的球囊扩张时间及心肌梗死复发情况均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组患者的护理结果满意度、病死率以及疗效评分均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:临床针对急性心肌梗死患者应用急救护理路径进行干预有着较好临床价值,不仅可以缩短患者的抢救时间,降低患者的病死率,还能保证患者的治疗效果,对于患者的预后有着重要的意义。
Objective:To analyze the effect of emergency nursing care in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Methods:from June 2016 to June-2017 in our hospital 180 cases of acute myocardial infarction patients, they were randomly divided into the control group and the experimental group, 90 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received routine nursing care, while the experimental group was given emergency care he results of the experimental group to balloon time(76.48 + 12.05) min myocardial infarction recurrence in 7 cases(7%); the control group balloon time for(122.4 + 15.84) min, 32 cases of recurrent myocardial infarction(32%); balloon dilatation and myocardial infarction recurrence of patients in the experimental group were better than the control group, there was statistical significant differences(P < 0.05). The nursing outcome, satisfaction, fatality rate and curative effect scores of the experimental group were better than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P < 0.05). Conclusion:the clinical application in patients with acute myocardial f the patients, is of great significance for the prognosis of patients.
出处
《中国妇幼健康研究》
2017年第S3期544-544,共1页
Chinese Journal of Woman and Child Health Research
关键词
急性心肌梗死
急诊急救护理
作用分析
acute myocardial infarction
emergency first aid nursing
function analysis
