期刊文献+

生态补偿PPP模式的金融创新机制研究 被引量:16

Research on Financial Innovation Mechanism of Ecological Compensation PPP Model
原文传递
导出
摘要 生态补偿项目具有较强的公益性,但缺少稳定现金流,在没有政府增信和有效质押融资的情况下难受金融机构青睐,其PPP模式推行举步维艰,而我国生态补偿资金缺口巨大,需要吸收社会资本的广泛参与。如何发挥政府主导和企业主体地位的作用,按照市场原则和可持续发展性,探索一种讲究商业原则、充分发挥市场主体积极性的生态补偿PPP模式的金融创新机制十分必要,可以从以下五个方面进行考虑,即价值挖掘机制、生态补偿增信机制、产融结合机制、风险分担机制及退出机制。 Ecological compensation projects have strong public welfare, it lacks stable cash flow. It is difficult for financial institutions to favor without the government’s credit enhancement and effective mortgage financing. Its PPP model is difficult to implement, and China’s ecological compensation fund gap is huge, and it needs to absorb social capital. How to give full play to the role of government-led and corporate subject status, and in accordance with market principles and sustainable development,it is necessary to explore a financial mechanism innovation that emphasizes commercial principles and gives full play to the enthusiasm of market participants, that is, the value excavator system, the ecological compensation and credit enhancement mechanism, the integration mechanism of industry and finance, the risk sharing mechanism and the exit mechanism.
作者 潘华 刘畅洁 PAN Hua;LIU Changjie(Faculty of Management and Economics,Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming Yunnan 650093,China)
出处 《生态经济》 北大核心 2019年第3期175-180,共6页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"吸引社会资本投入生态补偿的市场化机制研究"(14BJY029) 云南省社会科学基金重点项目"云南融入长江经济带发展战略研究"(ZDZZD201406)
关键词 生态补偿 PPP模式 金融创新机制 市场化机制 ecological compensation PPP mode financial innovation mechanism marketization mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献80

  • 1万军,张惠远,王金南,葛察忠,高树婷,饶胜.中国生态补偿政策评估与框架初探[J].环境科学研究,2005,18(2):1-8. 被引量:175
  • 2耿敏,范阳.中国产业投资基金:制约因素与发展路径[J].中国金融,2007(21):28-29. 被引量:9
  • 3Wunder S. Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts [R]. CIFOR Occasional Paper 42, 2005.
  • 4Wunder S, Alban M. Decentralized payments for environmental services: The cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(5): 685-698.
  • 5Asquith N M, Vargas M T, Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(5): 675-684.
  • 6Baylis K, Peplow S, Rausser G, et al. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison [J]. Ecological Economic, 2008, 65(5): 753-764.
  • 7Munoz-Pina C, Guevara A, Torres J M, et al. Paying for the hydrological services of Mexico's forests: Analysis, negotiations and results [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(5): 725-736.
  • 8Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica [J]. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(5):712-724.
  • 9Perrot-Maitre D. The Vittel payments for ecosystem services: A "perfect" PES case? [R]. London: lIED, Project Paper No.3, 2006.
  • 10Pagiola S, Platais G. Payments for environmental services: from theory to practice [R]. Washington DC: World Bank, 2007.

共引文献160

同被引文献150

引证文献16

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部