摘要
目的该次研究主要分析在根骨骨折患者治疗中采用改良切口、传统L形切口治疗的可行性。方法该次研究范围限定在该院2016年1月—2017年1月间收治的根骨骨折患者当中,研究样本需求量为60例,采用随机对照法将其分为对照组与观察组,对照组患者采用传统L形切口治疗,观察组患者采用改良切口治疗,将两组患者手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、切口长度、治疗总有效率、骨折复位情况作为对比依据。结果①观察组患者手术时间短于对照组患者(P<0.05);②观察组患者住院时间短于对照组患者(P<0.05);③观察组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组患者(P<0.05);④观察组患者骨折复位情况优异于对照组患者(P<0.05);⑤观察组患者术中出血量、切口长度均小于对照组患者(P<0.05)。结论该次研究证明,在根骨骨折患者治疗中采用改良切口治疗,有利于提高患者治疗效果,缩小患者手术时间与住院时间,改善患者治疗质量,可作为临床首选治疗方法推广。
Objective This study mainly focuses on the bone fracture with modified incision in the treatment of patients,the feasibility of traditional L incision treatment. Methods This study is limited in bone fracture in our hospital from January 2016 to January 2017, the study sample demand for 60 cases, using randomized controlled method it can be divided into control group and observation group, the control group were treated by traditional L incision treatment,observation group were treated by modified incision treatment, two groups of patients with operation time, hospitalization time, blood loss, intraoperative incision length, the total efficiency of treatment, fracture reduction as a comparison basis.Results Observation Groups of patients with operation time shorter than the control group(P<0.05); the patients in the observation group were shorter than the control group(P<0.05); the total efficiency of the observation group was higher than control group(P<0.05). The patients in the observation group were excellent fracture reduction in the control group(P<0.05). The observation of bleeding group of patients, incision length were less than control group(P<0.05). Conclusion The study proves that, in the treatment of patients with bone fracture with modified incision treatment, can improve the treatment effect, reduce the operation time and hospitalization time of patients, improve patient treatment Treatment quality can be used as the first choice in clinical treatment
出处
《双足与保健》
2017年第14期6-8,共3页
Biped and Health
关键词
根骨骨折
改良切口
传统L形切口
可行性
Bone fracture
Modified incision
Traditional L incision
Feasibility
