摘要
垄断行为法律认定的不确定性一方面是由于不同经济学流派对垄断这一经济状态具有不同的测定范式,另一方面是由法律语言和法律规范本身所具有的灵活性决定的。因而在具体反垄断司法实践中就需要进行个案考察,具体情况具体分析才能得出合理的判决。通过对我国典型性司法案例的考察认为,《反垄断法》第十三条第二款之规定就是我国反垄断司法实践中应坚持的"合理性原则"。
The uncertainty of monopoly conduct,in the one hand,is because different economic schools have different evaluation model to judge whether one market action or behavior is the monopoly conduction in Anti-monopoly Law; on the another hand,is because of the distinctive feature——Ambiguity of language. The aforesaid two factors construct an uncertainty of anti-monopoly law. Thus,in the anti-monopoly practice,we should make a specific analysis to each of the anti-monopoly case. Thereafter,reasonable and legal judgments can People's Court reach. According to examining typical judicatory cases of monopoly,the author deems that article 13. 2of Anti-Monopoly Law of China seem as the basis of application of Rationality Principle in the practice of Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law.
出处
《太原学院学报（社会科学版）》
2016年第5期15-20,25,共7页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
反垄断法
不确定性
合理性原则
Anti-Monopoly Law
uncertainty
rationality principle
