疝环充填式无张力疝修补与传统疝修补术的对比研究

Control Study Comparing Mesh Plug Hernioplasty with Traditional Methods of Hernia Repair

下载PDF

导出

摘要将 1 39例腹股沟疝患者随机分为无张力疝修补 (A组 )及传统疝修补 (B组 )两组 ,进行了前瞻性对比研究。结果显示 ,与传统疝修补术相比 ,疝环充填式无张力疝修补可减轻患者术后疼痛 ,降低复发率 ,缩短住院时间 ,并不增加术后并发症发生率。

作者彭蔚黄磊

机构地区湖北荆门职业技术学院医学分院武汉大学中南医院普外科

出处《数理医药学杂志》 2003年第5期413-414,共2页 Journal of Mathematical Medicine

关键词疝环充填式无张力疝修补传统疝修补术术后并发症疼痛复发生物相容性材料腹股沟疝

参考文献6

1Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S,et al. Late infection after mesh-plug inguinal hernio-plasty. Am J Surg , 2000,179(1), 76-77.
2Gianetta E, Cuneo S, Vitale B,et al. Anterior tension-free repair of recurrent inguinal hernia under local anesthesia ffi a 7-year experience in a teaching ospital. Ann Surg, 2000,231(1):132-136.
3Patino JF, Garcia-Herreros LG, Zundel N. Inguinal hernia repair.The Nyhus posterior preperitoneal operation. Surg Clin North Am, 1998.78(6): I063-1074.
4Price DD.Bush FM,Long S,et al. A comparison of pain measurement characte-ristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales, Pain, 1994,56:217.
5Dawson L, Brodkbank K, Carr ECJ, et al. Improving patient's postoperative sleep =a randomized control study comparing subcutaneous with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. J Adv Nuts,1999,30:875.
6Rutkow IM,Robbins AW. Mesh plug hernia repair-a follow-up report. Surgery, 1995,117:597- 598.

数理医药学杂志

2003年第5期

内容加载中请稍等...