期刊文献+

对中国劳动力市场中教育促进劳动生产率作用的实证检验 被引量:18

A Test of Educational Contribution to Augmenting Productivity in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 在中国特定的文化以及制度环境中,教育的个人收益率所反映的教育与收入的关系究竟来自社会对教育的信号作用的认同,还是代表了教育确实对提高劳动生产率产生的贡献?教育的生产性功能和筛选功能究竟是在多大程度上发挥作用的?随着市场经济的不断完善,教育的生产性功能与信息性功能是否会有变化?变化的趋势又如何?本文通过将中国劳动力市场中不同部门、不同地域的教育收益率进行对比,评估中国劳动力市场中教育的生产促进和筛选作用。同时通过对比不同时点进入劳动力市场的劳动者的教育收益率,验证教育的信息性功能与生产性功能变化的趋势,并从侧面检验中国劳动力市场的市场化进程。 Under the given cultures and institutional circumstances of China, does the relationship between the education and the income reflected by the personal rate of return to schooling come from the society's identification of the educational signaling, or represent the educational contribution to augmenting productivity? If so, to what extent do the productive function of education and the signaling function of education work respectively? Along with the market economy growing up gradually, will the productive function and the signaling function of education change? And what is the trend of this change? This paper compares the rate of return to schooling in different sectors and different regions, and assesses the educational contribution to augmenting productivity and the educational signaling function. At the same time, this paper compares the rate of return to schooling of the workers who entry labor market at the different periods, in order that we can explore the change trends of the educational signaling function and its productive function and suggest the marketization course of China 's labor market on side face.
出处 《清华大学教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2003年第5期41-45,共5页 Tsinghua Journal of Education
关键词 中国 劳动力市场 劳动生产率 人力资本理论 筛选理 教育收益率 受教育程度 human capital theory screening hypothesis labor market competitiveness rate of return to schooling
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1陈晓宇,陈良焜,夏晨.20世纪90年代中国城镇教育收益率的变化与启示[J].北京大学教育评论,2003,1(2):65-72. 被引量:135
  • 2Arabsheibani G, Rees H 1998 On the weak versus the strong version of the screening hypothesis. Economics of Education Review. 17(2): 189-192.
  • 3Cohn E, Kiker B F, Mendes De Oliveira M 1987 Further evidence on the screening hypothesis. Economics Letters. 25: 289-294.
  • 4Lambropoulos 1992 Further evidence on the weak and strong versions of screening hypothesis in Greece. Economics of Education Review. 11(1) : 61-65.
  • 5Lee K H 1980 Screening, ability, and the productivity of education in Malaysia. Economics Letters. 5:189 -193.
  • 6Mincer J 1974 Schooling, experience and earnings. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • 7Mincer J 1980 Human capital and earnings. In: Atkinson A B (ed.) 1980 Wealth, Income and Inquiry 22 (1). 121-127.
  • 8Psacharopoulos G 1979 On the weak versus the strong version of the screening hypothesis. Economics Letters. 4: 181-185.
  • 9Sarah Brown, John G 1999 Education and employment status., a test of the strong screening hypothesis in Italy. Economics of Education Review. 18.. 397-404.
  • 10Tucker Ⅲ I B 1986 Evidence on the weak and the strong version of the screening hypothesis in the United States. Economics Letters. 21: 391-394.

二级参考文献11

  • 1陈晓宇,闵维方.论中国高等教育的预期收益与劳动力市场化[J].教育研究,1999,20(1):35-40. 被引量:42
  • 2闵维方.发展知识经济的关键与大学的使命[J].教育研究,1998,19(9):29-33. 被引量:55
  • 3李实 李文彬 赵人伟 基斯·格里芬.中国教育投资的个人收益率的估计[A].赵人伟,基斯·格里芬.中国居民收入分配研究[C].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1994..
  • 4赖德胜.中国教育收益率估算,文献综述[J].经济研究资料,1997,(9).
  • 5曾满超.西方教育经济学及其最新发展(代序言)[A].西方教育经济学流派[C].曾满超等译.北京:北京师范大学出版社,1990:1-6.
  • 6M. Carnoy. Rate of Returns to Education[ A ]. in International Encyclopedia of Economics of Education[ E]. edited by Martin Carnoy. Pergamon, 1995 : 364 - 369.
  • 7George Psacharopoulos and Harry Anthony Patrinos. Returns to Investment in Education: A Further Update[ R ]. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2881, World Bank, September,2002.
  • 8陈晓宇,冉成中,陈良烜.近年中国城镇私人教育收益率的变化[A].闵维方,杨周复,李文利.为教育筹措更多的资源—教育经济学国际研讨会论文集[C].北京:人民教育出版社,2002.
  • 9赖德胜.教育、劳动力市场与收入分配[J].经济研究,1998,33(5):42-49. 被引量:283
  • 10陈晓宇,闵维方.我国高等教育个人收益率研究[J].高等教育研究,1998,19(6):33-37. 被引量:125

共引文献134

同被引文献265

引证文献18

二级引证文献184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部