期刊文献+

部分自杀未遂者两年后与社区正常对照比较 被引量:21

Comparison of Suicide Attempters and Matched Normal Control
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :分析有自杀未遂史者与社区中无自杀行为者的差异 ,以便有针对性地制定预防自杀的措施。方法 :用自制的调查问卷对 3 63例曾经就诊于三所综合医院的自杀未遂者进行两年后的随访 ,并按性别、年龄、居住地匹配无自杀行为者进行比较。结果 :尽管在性别、年龄、家庭收入、婚姻状况、职业、医疗来源方面两组无显著性差异 ,但与对照组比 ,有自杀未遂史组读书年限明显偏短 ,冲动性、攻击性的人格特征极为突出 ,近两年觉得活着没意思的频率高、遭遇的负性生活事件数目和相应的心理压力大 ,近一个月的生命质量、家庭亲密度和适应性差 ,近一周内的抑郁程度重。结论 :有自杀未遂史者两年之后 ,仍然在许多方面与正常对照有显著的差别。提示有自杀未遂史者是较独特的人群 ,应该对该高危人群建立相应的干预措施。 Objective:To compare suicide attempters with community-based controls for more specific prevention strategies.Method:From the list of suicide attempters of three general hospitals 2 years before, 363 of 786 attempters (48.5%) were found. We collected a control group matched for sex, age and location of residence and compared the life events for the past two years, life quality, family cohesion and adaptability of the past month, and impulsivity and aggressiveness.Result:The two groups were similar in sex, age, family income, marital status, occupation and health insurance status. But the suicide attempt group had less education, had more prominent impulsive and aggressive in traits, had higher levels of hopelessness, more negative life events and greater distress from negative life events in the two years after their attempt. They had poorer life quality and lower family cohesion and adaptability for the past month. They had also more severe depressive symptoms in the prior week.Conclusion:Two years after their suicide attempt, the attempters still have substantial differences from normal controls. They are a distinct high-risk subgroup that deserves specific interventions.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2003年第12期856-858,855,共4页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
基金 瑞典国际开展署 (SIDA)和美国预防自杀协会资助
关键词 自杀未遂 社区 精神病学 病例对照研究 psychiatry suicide attempts case-control studies follow up
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1[1]Phillips MR, Li XY, Zhang YP. Suicide rates in China,1995-99. Lancet,2002,359:835-840.
  • 2[2]Phillips MR, Yang GH, Zhang YP, et al. Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case-control Psychological autopsy study. Lancet, 2002, 360:1728-1736.
  • 3[3]Maris RW, Berman AL, Silverman MM. Comprehensive textbook of suicidology. New York: The Guliford Press, 2000.
  • 4[6]Patton JH, Stanford MS, Barratt ES. Factor Structure of The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychohogy, 1995, 51(6): 768-774 .
  • 5[7]Amold LH, Buss AH, Perry MM. The Aggression Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1992, 63(3): 452-459.
  • 6张迟,何凤生,费利鹏,杨荣山,及惠玉,李献云.口服农药自杀未遂者一般情况的病例对照研究[J].医学与社会,2000,13(5):13-15. 被引量:9
  • 7[10]Maris RW. Overview of the study of suicide Assessment and Prediction. In: Maris RW et al(eds): Assessment and Prediction of Suicide. New York: The Guiford Press, 1992:3-22.
  • 8[11]Fernquist RM. Education, Race/Ethnicity, Age, Sex, and Suicide: Individual-Level Data in The United States, 1991-1994. Current Research in Social Psychology. 2001, 6(18): 277-290.
  • 9赵后锋,田玉湘.67例抑郁障碍伴自杀行为的临床对照研究[J].四川精神卫生,1998,11(2):94-95. 被引量:4
  • 10何洲,王启军,董庆好.抑郁症自杀行为的临床特征[J].临床精神病学杂志,1999,9(4):242.

二级参考文献14

共引文献90

同被引文献218

引证文献21

二级引证文献516

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部