期刊文献+

朱砂叶螨的抗药性选育及其解毒酶活性研究 被引量:52

Study on Resistance Selection and Activity of Detoxifieation Enzyme in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boiduval)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在室内模拟田间药剂的选择压力,用阿维菌素和甲氰菊酯对朱砂叶螨Tetranychuscinnabarinus进行逐代处理,以选育其抗药性品系。阿维菌素品系选育至42代,抗性增长到8.7倍,甲氰菊酯品系选育至40代,抗性增长到68.5倍。阿维菌素抗性品系羧酸酯酶(CarE)、谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶(GSTs)、多功能氧化酶(MFO)的活性分别为敏感品系的2.7、3.4和1.4倍,差异达显著水平。推测3种解毒酶活性显著升高是朱砂叶螨对阿维菌素产生抗性的重要原因。甲氰菊酯抗性品系GSTs的活性为敏感品系的2.8倍,差异显著,表明该抗性品系的形成与GSTs活性增强有关。羧酸酯酶动力学测定结果表明,朱砂叶螨阿维菌素抗性品系体内存在变构的羧酸酯酶。 Fenpropathrin and abamectin were used to select the resistance in Tetranychus cinnabarinus in (laboratory.) After 42 and 40 generations selection with abamectin and fenpropathrin, Tetranychus (cinnabarinus) developed 8.7 and 68.5-fold resistance to the two acaricides respectively. The major resistant mechanism to abamectin was the increasing of the activity of carboxylesterases (CarE), glutathion (S-(transferase)) (GSTs) and mixed function oxidase (MFO), and the activity in resistant strain developed 2.7, (3.4 and )1.4-fold contrasted to susceptible strain respectively. The activity of GSTs in the strain (selected) with fenpropathrin developed 2.8 fold contrast to susceptible strain, which meant the resistance was related with the increasing of the activity of GSTs in resistant strain. The result of the kinetic determination of CarE showed that the structure of CarE in the strain selected with abamectin has been changed.
出处 《农药学学报》 CAS CSCD 2003年第4期23-29,共7页 Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(39970493) 重庆市科技攻关资助项目(6606).
关键词 朱砂叶螨 阿维菌素 甲氰菊酯 抗药性 解毒酶 Tetranychus cinnabarinus abamectin fenpropathrin resistance detoxifieation enzyme
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献27

  • 1刘传秀,韩招久,李凤良,陈之浩.应用蛭石萝卜苗法室内继代大量繁殖小菜蛾的研究[J].昆虫知识,1993,30(6):341-344. 被引量:80
  • 2陈巧云 姜家良 等.淡色库蚁对敌百虫抗性的研究——水解酶同敌百虫抗性关系[J].昆虫学报,1980,23(4):350-357.
  • 3姜家良 陈巧云 等.抗有机磷淡色库蚊的羟酸酯酶研究[J].昆虫学研究集刊,1980,(1):69-76.
  • 4[1]Bloch G. Wool D, 1994. Methidathion resistance in the sweetpotato whitefly (Aleyredidae: Homoptera) in Israel: Selection, heritability, and correlated changes of esterase activity. J. Econ. Entomol., 87 (5): 1147-1156.
  • 5[2]Cochran D G, 1987. Selection for pyrethroid resistance in the German cock roach. J. Econ. Entomol. 80 (6): 1 117-1 121.
  • 6[3]Firko M J, Hayes J L, 1990. Quantitative genetic tools for insecticide resis tance risk assessment: estimation the heritability of resistance. J. Econ. Entomol., 83 (3): 647-654.
  • 7[5]Hoy M A, Conley J, Robinson W, 1988. Cyhexatin and fenbutatin-oxide re sistance in Pacific spider mite: stability and mode of inheritance. J. Econ. Entomol., 81 (1): 57 - 64.
  • 8[6]Keena M A, Granett J, 1990. Genetic analysis of propargite resistance in Pa cific spider mites and two spotted spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 83 (3): 655-661.
  • 9[11]Tabashnik B E, 1992. Resistance risk assessment: realized heritability of re sistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm ( Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), and colorado potato beetle ( Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 85 (5): 1 551 - 1 559.
  • 10Tan Jinguo,Resistant Pest Management,1993年,5卷,1期,11页

共引文献245

同被引文献633

引证文献52

二级引证文献389

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部