期刊文献+

基于硼替佐米的BAD、BCD和BRD化疗方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤的疗效和安全性 被引量:25

Efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based BAD,BCD and BRD chemotherapy regimens in the newly treatment of multiple myeloma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨以硼替佐米为主的化疗方案治疗初治多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年1月至2016年1月收治的66例初治MM患者的临床资料,按照接受化疗方案不同分为BAD组(硼替佐米+阿霉素+地塞米松)22例,BCD组(硼替佐米+环磷酰胺+地塞米松)14例和BRD(硼替佐米+来那度胺+地塞米松)组30例。对三组短期疗效进行分析,记录总生存(OS)和无进展生存(PFS),根据NCI常见不良反应事件评价标准(CTCAE)第4版评估治疗期间的毒副反应。结果三组患者总体发生率(ORR)比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。所有患者均接受至少4个疗程化疗,ORR 71.2%,随着疗程数增加,患者完全缓解(CR)率与ORR率逐渐增加,接受5~7个疗程患者ORR 79.6%,接受8个以上疗程患者ORR为88.9%,三种不同疗程时的ORR率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),以接受8个以上疗程患者ORR最高。本组66例患者随访时间8~61个月,截止随访时间为2018年1月31日,中位随访时间为21个月。全部患者中位OS 48个月(95%CI:20.47~101.53),中位PFS为26个月(95%CI:27.03~38.92),三组OS(P=0.996)和PFS(P=0.956)比较无统计学差异。所有患者不良反应症状较轻。三组间血液学毒性及消化道反应比较有统计学差异(P均<0.01),以BAD组最高。结论以硼替佐米为基础的BAD、BCD和BRD化疗方案对MM具有良好疗效,且4个月以上疗程临床疗效较显著,三种方案在OS及PFS未见统计学差异。在毒副作用评估方面BAD方案血液学及消化道毒副作用最高。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of bortezomib-based chemotherapy regimens in the newly treatment of multiple myeloma(MM).Methods The clinical data of 66 MM patients with newly treated admitted to hospital from January 2013 to January 2016 were retrospectively analyzed.According to different chemotherapy regimens,the patients were divided into BAD group(bortezomib+adriamycin+dexamethasone,n=22),BCD group(bortezomib+cyclophosphamide+dexamethasone,n=14)and BRD group(bortezomib+lenalidomide+dexamethasone,n=30).The short-term curative effects of three regimens were observed,and the overall survival(OS)and progression-free survival(PFS)were recorded.Toxicity side effects during treatment were assessed according to the fourth edition of NCI-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events(CTCAE).Results There was no significant difference in overall response rate(ORR)among three groups(P>0.05).All patients received at least 4 courses of chemotherapy,and ORR was 71.2%.With the increase in number of chemotherapy courses,complete remission(CR)and ORR of patients increased gradually.ORR was 79.6%in patients receiving 5-7 courses and 88.9%in patients receiving more than 8 courses.There were significant differences in ORR rates among three different courses of treatment(P<0.01),and ORR of patients receiving more than 8 courses was highest.The follow-up period of 66 patients ranged from 8 to 61 months,with a mean follow-up of 21 months.The deadline for follow-up was January 31,2018.The median OS and PFS were 48 months(95%CI:20.47-101.53)and 26 months(95%CI:27.03-38.92)respectively.There were no significant differences in OS(P=0.996)and PFS(P=0.956)among three groups.The adverse reactions were mild in all patients.The incidences of hematological toxicity and digestive tract reaction had statistical differences between three groups(all P<0.01),and the highest was in BAD group.Conclusions Bortezomib-based BAD,BCD and BRD chemotherapy regimens have a good effect on MM,and the clinical efficacy is more obvious in patients receiving treatment for more than four months.There are no statistical differences in OS and PFS among three therapy regimens for MM patients.The hematological and gastrointestinal adverse reactions of BAD regimen are highest.
作者 张婷 马永超 杨莉莉 师锦宁 ZHANG Ting;MA Yong-chao;YANG Li-li;SHI Jin-ning(Department of Hematology,The Affiliated Jiangning Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211100,China)
出处 《中国临床研究》 CAS 2019年第4期504-508,共5页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Research
基金 南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK15199)~~
关键词 多发性骨髓瘤 硼替佐米 地塞米松 化学治疗 不良反应 Multiple myeloma Bortezomib Dexamethasone Chemotherapy Adverse reaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1袁振刚,侯健,周帆,王东星,付卫军,陈玉宝,奚昊,杨盛玲.硼替佐米联合地塞米松治疗16例复发、难治性多发性骨髓瘤患者[J].中华血液学杂志,2006,27(10):653-655. 被引量:21
  • 2Raab MS, Podar K, Breitkreutz I, et al. Multiple myeloma [J]. Lancet, 2009, 374(9686): 324-339.
  • 3Berenson JR, Yellin O, Bessudo A, et al. Phase Ⅰ/Ⅱ trial assessing bendamustine plus bortezomib combination therapy for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma[J]. BrJ Haematol, 2013, 160(3): 321-330.
  • 4Durie BG, Harousseau JL, Miguel JS, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma [J]. Leukemia, 2006, 20(9): 1467-1473.
  • 5Koren J, Spicka I, Straub J, et al. Retrospective analysis of the results of high-dose chemotherapy with the support of autologous blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma. The experience of a single centre [J]. Prague Med Rep, 2010, 111(3): 207-218.
  • 6Harousseau JL, Attal M, Avet-Loiseau H, et al. Bortezomib plus dexamethasone is superior to vincristine plus doxorubicin plus dexamethasone as inductiontreatment prior to autologous stem- cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results of the IFM 2005-01 phase Ⅲ trial [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(30): 4621-4629.
  • 7Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J, et al. A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348(26): 2609-2617.
  • 8Mateos MV, Hernandez JM, Hemandea MT, et al. Bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone in elderly untreated patients with multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter phase 1/2 study [J]. Blood, 2006, 108(7): 2165-2172.
  • 9Ma MH, Yang HH, Parker K, et al. The proteasome inhibitor PS-341 markedly enhances sensitivity of multiple myeloma tu- mor cells to chemotherapeutic agents [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2003, 9(3): 1136-1144.
  • 10Mitsiades N, Mitsisiades CS, Richardson PG, et al. The protea- some inhibitor PS-341 potentiates sensitivity of multiple myelo- ma cells to conventional chemotherapeutic agents: therapeutic applications[J]. Blood, 2003, 101 (6): 2377-2380.

共引文献151

同被引文献223

引证文献25

二级引证文献76

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部