摘要
出于构建"后马克思主义"领导权理论的需要,拉克劳、墨菲不遗余力地展开了对"本质主义"的解构工作。在他们看来,经济决定论是本质主义的"最后堡垒"。新的领导权概念必须消除传统的本质主义的束缚,必须祛除"经济的最终决定性作用"。然而,拉克劳、墨菲对马克思主义理论的理解并不准确,他们不但将历史唯物论定性为简单的经济决定论,而且也对经济的决定作用作了绝对化的理解,这均是对马克思主义的误读。
In order to construct the theory of"post-Marxism"hegemony,Laclau and Mouffe spare no effort to deconstruct the"essentialism".In their opinions,the new hegemony must eliminate the bound of traditional essentialism which must dispel"the final decisive effect of economic",because the economical determinism is the essentialism’s"last redoubt". However,Laclau and Mouffe’s understanding of Marxism is not accurate,in their opinion,the Historical Materialism is defined as a simple economic determinism,and moreover,they make absolute understanding of the role of economic decisions. These two opinions are misreadings of Marxism.
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2009年第6期114-117,共4页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
