期刊文献+

大学生学习风格量表的设计与开发 被引量:39

The Development of the Inventory of Learning Styles for Undergraduate Student
下载PDF
导出
摘要  从学生学习观、学习取向、加工策略和管理策略四个方面构造了一个包括204个题目的大学生学习风格量表,并应用这一量表对西安交通大学3125名一年级大学生实施了调查,在此基础上,采用多种统计方法对有关题目进行了筛选,进而建构了一个具有较高可靠性的、包含112个题目的大学生学习风格量表。研究表明:学生学习观、学习取向、加工策略和管理策略之间存在紧密的联系,由这四个部分中的有关维度构成的大学生学习风格可以分为再现导向、意义导向和情景导向三种类型,采用这三种学习风格的学生各占1/3左右。 Based on the literature review, a diagnostic instrument is constructed that covers four student's learning components, i.e., conception of learning, studying orientations, cognitive processing strategies, and metacognitive regulation strategies. The instrument, which involves 204 topics, was administered to 3125 freshmen from Xi'an Jiaotong University. Factor analyses and other statistic techniques on the data are applied to achieve a more reliable model of student learning containing 112 topics. From these analyses, it is found there is a close tie between learning components: student's conception of learning, studying orientations, cognitive processing strategies, and metacognitive regulation strategies. The learning styles formed of relevant dimensionalities for the four components can be separated into reproduction-directed, meaning-directed and situation directed styles. The number of students adopting each learning style is about one-third.
作者 陆根书
出处 《西安交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 2003年第3期86-96,F003,共12页 Journal of Xi'an Jiaotong University:Social Sciences
关键词 学习风格 高等教育 大学生 learning styles higher education individual difference
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1[1]林毓琦.大学学习学[M].西安:西安交通大学出版社,1999.
  • 2[3]Grigerenko, E. L. and Sternberg, R. J. Thinking styles. In Saklofske, D. H. and Zeidner, M. (eds.). International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence[ M ]. Plenum Press, 1995. 205 -230.
  • 3[4]Pask,G.Styles and Strategies of Learning[J] .Br.J.Educ. Psy chol, 1976, (46): 128 - 148.
  • 4[5]Gregorc, A. R. Style Delineator[ M]. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Sys tems, 1982.
  • 5[6]S? lj?,R. Learning in the learners' perspective(I):some com monsense conceptions[ R]. Reports from the Departnent of Edu cation, University of G. teborg, No. 76,1979.
  • 6[7]Marton, F. and Saljo, R. Approaches to learning. In Marton, F. et al. (eds.). The experience of learning[ M]. Edinburgh: Scot tish Academic Press, 1984.
  • 7[8]Van Rossum, E.J. & Schenk, S. M. The Relationship Between Learning Conception, Study Strategy and Learning Outcome [ J ]. Br. J. Educ. Psycho0. , 1984,(54):73-83.
  • 8[9]Biggs, J. B. Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J. R. Kirby ( ed. ). Cognitive strategies and educational performance [ M ]. New York: Aca demic Press, 1984.
  • 9[10]Taylor, E. M. Orientation to study: a longitudinal investigation of two degree courses in one university[ R]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Surrey, UK, 1983.
  • 10[11]Bandura,A.Social Foundations of Thought and Action:A Social Cognitive Theory [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.

同被引文献247

引证文献39

二级引证文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部