摘要
目的分析1999～2001年《中国创伤骨科杂志》(《中华创伤骨科杂志》前身)和2002～2003年《中华创伤骨科杂志》所刊载论文及其引文,以了解该刊的发展状况,供对本刊的专业水平和刊物特色进行评估时参考。方法用文献计量学方法,统计包括专家论坛、临床论著、临床经验、综述、实验研究、讲座、病例报告等栏目共568篇论文的基金论文比,总引文量,引文语种,引文类型,普赖斯指数及自引率等。结果568篇论文中有引文的为462篇,总引文量3887条,平均引文8.41篇;中、外文文献之比为1:1.71;图书与期刊类文献之比为1:10.49;平均普赖斯指数47.67%;著者和本刊自引率分别为4.04%和2.80%。引用达20次以上的英文刊物有13种,中文刊物有12种。基金论文比为10.38%。另外,2002～2003年除临床经验和病例报告外,共有178篇论文,其中有引文论文为173篇,总引文量为1700条,平均引文量9.83;中、英文文献之比为1:1.90;期刊引文占91.47%;著者自引率为5.76%。2002、2003年所刊载基金论文比分别为12.35%、30.93%。结论该刊创刊时间不长,但论文学术质量不断提高,作者群具有较强的情报控制能力,英文期刊为主要情报来源等说明了该刊今后在创伤骨科学方面具有科研导向功能。
Objective To evaluate Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma so as to understand its features, current academic status, and the progress it has made since publication. Methods A bibliometric survey was done to analyze ratio of foundation-supported papers, the number, type, language, year and Prices index of citations as well as the co-citations in the 568 papers published from 1999 to 2003 in the major columns of Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, such as Expert Forum, Clinical Research, Clinical Experience, Review, Laboratory Res earch, Lecture, Case Report, and Biomechanics. Results Of the 568 papers, 462 ha d 3887 citations. The average number of citation was 8.41 per paper. The languag es used were mostly Chinese and English, and their ratio was 1:1.71. The major c itation types were mostly papers from periodicals and books, and their ratio was 10.39:1. The average Prices index rate was 47.67%. The co-citation rates of the authors and of the journal were 4.04% and 2.80% respectively. The most f requently cited core journals were 13 English written journals and 12 Chinese wr itten journals. The foundation-supported papers accounted for 10.38 % of the total papers. Moreover, as for the papers published in 2002 to 2003, there were 178 research papers, 173 of which had 1700 citations with the average number of citation being 9.83. The ratio between the Chinese citations and the English one s was 1: 1.90. The citations from periodicals accounted for 91.47%. The co-cit ation rate of the authors was 5.76%. The proportion of foundation-supported pa pers published in 2002 and 2003 were 12.35% and 30.93% respectively. Conclus ion The survey suggests that although the journal has been published for less th an five years, it has made constant progress in the quality of its papers. The f act that the authors have showed adequate ability to control necessary informati on and have used English journals as their main information sources suggests tha t the journal can serve as a leading guide in the scientific research in orthopa edics and traumatology.
出处
《中华创伤骨科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2004年第1期107-109,117,共4页
Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
