期刊文献+

选择偏差、比较优势与教育的异质性回报∶基于中国微观数据的实证研究 被引量:152

Heterogeneity,Selection Bias and the Return to Education:A Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Micro-Data
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文根据 2 0 0 0年中国的微观数据 ,运用现代微观计量经济学的分析方法 ,在考虑异质性和选择偏差的基础上 ,估计了 2 0世纪末中国的教育回报。研究结果表明 :与受教育水平相关的收益在人们中间存在显著的异质性 ;在当今中国的劳动力市场上存在一种重要的实证现象 ,即人们根据比较优势原理对教育水平进行选择。传统的普通最小二乘法以及工具变量法都难以对这种选择做出合理的估计 ,我们的分析框架弥补了上述两种方法的缺陷。 2 0 0 0年中国 6个省区城镇青年大学教育的平均回报率为 43 % (年均近 1 1 % )。中国在经历二十多年的市场经济改革后 ,较之 80年代及 90年代初期 ,教育的平均回报有了显著提高 ,中国的教育和劳动力市场已经开始发挥重要作用。 This paper uses newly available Chinese micro data to estimate the return to college education for late 20th century China when allowing for heterogeneous returns among individuals selecting into schooling based on these differences. We use modern micro-econometric methods to identify the parameters of interest. We demonstrate that heterogeneity among people in returns to schooling is substantial. People sort into schooling on the basis of the principle of comparative advantage, which we document to be an empirically important phenomenon in modern Chinese labor markets. Standard least squares or instrumental variable methods do not properly account for this sorting. Using new methods that do, we estimate the effect on earnings of sending a randomly selected person to college is a 43% increase in lifetime earnings (nearly 11% annually) in 2000 for young people in urban areas of six provinces of China. Our evidence, and simple least squares evidence, suggests that after 20-plus years of economic reform with market orientation, the return to education has increased substantially in China, compared to the returns measured in the 1980's and the early 1990's.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第4期91-99,116,共10页 Economic Research Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Bjortdund, A. and R. Moffltt, 1987, "The Estimation of Wage Gains and Welfare Gains in Serf-Selection Models", Revieto of geonomics and Statistics, 69:42-49.
  • 2Carneiro, P. , 2002, "Heterogeneity and Selection in the Return to Schooling: Implications for Education Policy Evaluation", Ph. D.Dissertation, University of Chicago.
  • 3Carneiro, P. and J. Heckman,2002, "The Evidence on Credit Constraints in Post-Secondary Schooling", Economic Journal, Volume 112,issue 482, pp: 705-734.
  • 4-,2003, "Human Capital Policy," in J. Heckman, A. Krueger. Inequality in America: What Role for Human Capital Policies ,Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 5Carneiro, P., J. Heckman and E. Vytlacil,2001, "Estimating the Return to Education When It Varies Among Individuals", Working paper,University of Chicago.
  • 6China's Urban Household Income and Expenditure Survey (CUHIES). 2000, National Bureau of Statistics, Urban Soeio-Economic Survey Organization.
  • 7Chow, G. ,2001, China's Economic Transformation. Malden. MA: Blackwell Publishers.
  • 8Gfiliches, Z., 1977, "Estimating the Returns to Schooling: .Some Econometric Problems," Econometrica, Volume 45, number 1, pp. 1-22.
  • 9Heckman, J. ,2001, "Microdata, Heterogeneity and Econometric Policy Evaluation", Nobel Memorial Lecture in Economic Sciences, Journal of Political Economy, 109(4), 673-748.
  • 10Heckman, J., L. Lochner and P. Todd., 2003, "Fifty Years of Mincer Earnings Functions," Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago.

同被引文献1948

引证文献152

二级引证文献3009

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部