摘要
刑法司法解释在弥补我国刑法立法的不足、保持刑法的稳定、克服刑法规范的抽象性等方面发挥了巨大的作用。但我国现行的刑法司法解释违背罪刑法定原则,立法化、抽象化的现象十分严重。同时,刑法司法解释之间、刑法司法解释与我国刑法理论的通说之间存在着明显的冲突。部分刑法司法解释的方法也存在严重的不足。因此,司法机关对刑法进行司法解释必须遵循罪刑法定原则、合理性原则、明确性原则。
Judicial interpretations of the criminal law can amend the legislative insufficiency of our criminal law, keep the stabilization of the law and overcome its abstract standards; in these aspects, judicial interpretations has exerted a great impact. However, current judicial interpretation of criminal law violates the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime and makes the legislative and abstract trend more serious. Meanwhile, there are obvious conflicts between judicial interpretation and common practice of criminal-law theory, even among these interpretations. And a part of interpretations has severe shortness in methods. Therefore, while interpreting judicial articles, judicial institutions must follow the principle of a prescribed punishment for a specified crime, of rationality and of clarity.
出处
《学术交流》
北大核心
2004年第7期25-28,共4页
Academic Exchange
关键词
刑法
司法解释
完善
criminal law, judicial interpretation, soundness
