期刊文献+

孟子与荀子的人性论之比较

A Comparison between Mencius and Xuncius’ Theory of Human Nature
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一直以来,人性论都是各界学者时常讨论的命题。尤其是先秦时期的思想家孟子与荀子的人性论,导致后人进行激烈的辩论,并深受其影响。为何他们的人性论会产生激烈的争论,两者的人性论又有何不同?在此,对孟子与荀子的人性论进行分析与解读,通过两者的基本观点,进一步分析两者的异同,从而得出两者之间的不同之处在于孟子的主要观点是人性先天是善的,而恶是后天的人为,荀子的观点是人性是恶的,善是人的后天人为;而两者的相同之处就在于最终指向,都强调要实现一个良好稳定的社会,而每一个人都应该行善。基于此,从而让人们清晰知晓两者的人性论。 The theory of human nature has always been a topic discussed by scholars from all walks of life. In particular, the human nature theory of Mencius and Xuncius’, thinkers in the pre-Qin period, led to fierce debate and was deeply influenced by them. Why their theories of human nature are hotly contested and what are the differences between them? Here, on Mencius and Xuncius’ theory of human nature carries on the analysis and interpretation, the paper further analyzes both the similarities and differences, thus it is concluded that the difference between two is that the main point of Mencius is that the innate human nature is good, and evil is acquired artificially;Xuncius’ view is that human nature is evil, good is people the day after tomorrow. What they have in common is that they both emphasize the realization of a good and stable society, and everyone should do the good. Based on this, people clearly understand the two human nature theories.
作者 杨川 晏欢
出处 《哲学进展》 2022年第5期1130-1134,共5页 Advances in Philosophy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1李亚彬.孟荀人性论比较研究[J].哲学研究,1994(8):60-67. 被引量:5
  • 2黄克剑.孟荀之辨[J].哲学研究,2006(10):35-43. 被引量:3
  • 3王利军.孟荀殊途同归:性善说与性恶说的比较分析[J].山东理工大学学报(社会科学版),2007,23(2):52-55. 被引量:3
  • 4张岱年全集:第2卷[M].石家庄:河北人民出版社,1996.
  • 5惠吉星.苟子与中国文化[M].贵阳:贵州出版社,1996.
  • 6谭嗣同全集(下册)[M].北京:中华书局,1990.
  • 7张伯行.朱子语类辑略[M].上海:商务印书馆,1936.
  • 8王庆元.荀子注译[A].许嘉璐.诸子集成(上册)[Z].桂林:广西教育出版社,1995.
  • 9赵航.孟子注译[A].许嘉璐.诸子集成(上册)[z].广西教育出版社,1995.
  • 10刘家和.先秦儒家仁礼学说新探[A].陈其泰,等.二十世纪中国礼学研究论集[C].北京:学苑出版社,1998.

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部