摘要
室内装修污染问题存在两个主要的争论点,首先是室内装修污染是一般的侵权还是环境污染侵权问题,由于法律的定义模糊以及技术上判定存在困难,将一个案件定性为环境污染案件需要理论以及技术支持。其次是此类案件应当适用于何种举证责任,有利于被侵权人的举证责任倒置规则在现实中运用效果不佳。本文就室内装修污染侵权如何区别于一般的环境侵权以及界定室内装修污染侵权和普通的人身健康权侵权进行论述,由此分析是室内装修污染侵权适用于环境侵权还是普通环境侵权问题,并根据侵权责任应当适用于何种举证责任问题进行分析,具体说明举证责任倒置在现实中的应用问题。
There are two main arguments about indoor decoration pollution. The first is whether indoor de-coration pollution is a general infringement or environmental pollution infringement. Due to the vague definition of the law and the difficulties in technical determination, it needs theoretical and technical support to characterize a case as environmental pollution. Secondly, what kind of burden of proof should be applied to such cases, which is not good for the application of the inversion rule of burden of proof in reality. In this paper, the indoor decoration pollution tort how to distinguish it from the general environmental tort and indoor decoration pollution tort and ordinary infringement of personal right to health is discussed, the analysis is suitable for indoor decoration pollution tort environment infringement or ordinary environment infringement problems, and according to the tort liability shall be applicable to any burden problem is analyzed, the specific illustrates the application of onus probandi inversion in the real problem.
出处
《社会科学前沿》
2021年第8期2099-2105,共7页
Advances in Social Sciences
