摘要
目的:数据同化将观测数据和基于模型的方法有机结合,以实现更精准的预测和状态估计,在多个领域都发挥着积极的作用。近年来,数据同化在核工业领域的重要性不断上升。为了分析现有的同化算法在不同数据场景下的表现,本文对集成卡尔曼滤波(EnKF)、三维变分(3D-Var)和四维变分(4D-Var)数据同化方法进行了详细的对比分析。方法:为了验证上述同化方法在不同数据场景下的同化效果,本文利用Lorenz-96模型生成仿真数据,并添加不同误差水平的噪声,同时获取具有不同观测间隔的数据。利用不同的数据集对同化方法进行分析,通过统计分析时空均方根误差来评估同化效果。结果:实验结果表明:EnKF在不同观测噪声水平和观测间隔的数据下展现出卓越的同化效果,适用于实际复杂系统的数据同化。3D-Var由于仅在当前数据点进行同化,因此在同化速度上较为迅速;而4D-Var方法则对给定窗口内的数据进行同化,导致同化时间相对于3D-Var较长。
Introduction: Data assimilation seamlessly combines observational data with model-based methods to achieve more accurate predictions and state estimations, playing a positive role in multiple domains. In recent years, the significance of data assimilation in the nuclear industry has been steadily increasing. In order to assess the effectiveness of assimilation algorithms across various data scenarios, this paper conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of data assimilation methods, including Ensemble Kalman Filter (EnKF), 3D-Var, and 4D-Var. Method: To validate the assimilation effectiveness of the methods above in various data scenarios, this study uses the Lorenz-96 model to generate simulated data. Different noise levels are added, and data with varying observation intervals are obtained. The assimilation methods are applied to different datasets, and the assimilation performance is evaluated through statistical analysis of the root mean square error in space and time. Result: The experimental results indicate that EnKF demonstrates excellent assimilation performance across different levels of observational noise and observation intervals, making it suitable for data assimilation in practical complex systems. Due to its assimilation being confined to the current data points, 3D-Var exhibits a faster assimilation speed. On the other hand, 4D-Var assimilates data within a given window, resulting in a relatively longer assimilation time than 3D-Var.
出处
《核科学与技术》
2024年第3期129-138,共10页
Nuclear Science and Technology
