摘要
《无证无照经营查处办法》的正式出台和施行,对于不再需要查处的无证经营行为进行了明确的界定,除该部分被划定合法的经营行为之外,大量的传统意义上的无证经营行为依旧需要受到规制和查处。无证经营行为不同于通常经营活动的行为模式,基于此种情况,对于无证经营者和无证经营行为的主体性质界定和行为性质界定存在一定的争议。而无证经营行为由于其符合于商事行为本质属性的营利性行为特征,出于对消费者、处于竞争地位的有证经营主体以及市场正常经济秩序的保护,无证经营者理应承担与行政责任、民事责任有所区分的商事行为责任,具体主要包括法定义务与合同的默示担保义务两大方面。
The formal introduction and implementation of the“procedures for investigation and punishment of unlicensed and unlicensed operations”has clearly defined the unlicensed business activities that no longer need to be investigated and dealt with,except for the part that has been designated as legitimate business conduct.A large number of traditional unlicensed business behaviors still need to be regulated and investigated.The behavior of unlicensed business is different from the behavior mode of ordinary business activities.Based on this situation,there are some disputes about the definition of the subject nature and the behavior nature of the unlicensed operator and the unlicensed business behavior.Because of its characteristics of profit-making behavior which accords with the essential attribute of commercial behavior,the unlicensed operation is out of a competitive position to consumers.The protection of the main body and the normal economic order of the market,the unlicensed operator should bear the responsibility of the administrative responsibility and the civil liability,which is divided into two main aspects,including the legal ob-ligation and the implied warranty obligation of the contract.
出处
《法学（汉斯）》
2019年第3期27-35,共9页
Open Journal of Legal Science
