期刊文献+

编造、故意传播虚假信息罪的司法认定

Judicial Determination of the Crime of Fabricating and Deliberately Spreading False Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在司法实践中,司法机关出现对于编造、故意传播虚假信息罪同案不同判的“窘境”,而笔者将通过对编造、故意传播虚假信息罪构成要件的剖析以及将该罪与相关罪名进行比较分析,从而充分明确对该罪的司法认定。进而统一刑事司法标准,贯彻落实刑法适用平等原则,即对任何人犯罪,在适用法律上一律平等。细处着眼于该罪的构成要件,广处则从编造、故意传播虚假恐怖信息罪、网络寻衅滋事罪着手,将其相区分的同时指明之后对于三者之间可能的发展趋势。只有通过刑事立法方面的规范落实,才能促进刑事司法的完善发展。 In judicial practice, there is a “dilemma” of different sentences for the crime of fabricating and intentionally spreading false information in the same case, and the author will analyze the elements of the crime of fabricating and intentionally spreading false information and make a comparative analysis of the crime and related charges, so as to fully clarify the judicial recognition of the crime. Then unify the standards of criminal justice, implement the principle of equal application of criminal law, that is, to anyone who commits a crime, in the application of the law is equal. The detailed part focuses on the constitutive elements of the crime, and the broad part starts from the crime of fabricating and intentionally spreading false terrorist information and the crime of picking quarrels and provoking troubles on the Internet. At the same time, it distinguishes them and points out the possible development trend between the three later. Only through the standard implementation of criminal legislation can we promote the perfect development of criminal justice.
作者 黄怡
机构地区 宁波大学法学院
出处 《法学(汉斯)》 2023年第3期891-899,共9页 Open Journal of Legal Science
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献103

共引文献108

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部