期刊文献+

The Area under the Curve (AUC) of Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) Could Be a Measure Method of Hyperglycemia in All Pregnant Women 被引量:3

The Area under the Curve (AUC) of Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) Could Be a Measure Method of Hyperglycemia in All Pregnant Women
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective: We adopted the area under the curve (AUC) of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a measure method of the severity of maternal hyperglycemia and investigated its relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes among women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Our study group collected the medical records of 15,296 women who received perinatal care in 15 hospitals in Beijing and who delivered from July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. And several original articles on this cohort have been published. In this study, we analyze the relationship between AUC and adverse perinatal outcomes, so that in multiple pregnant cases, patients with pre-pregnancy diabetes, hypertension, and abnormal kidney function and those who did not receive a 75-g OGTT were excluded. A Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the associations. Results: In total, 13,561 women were included. As the AUC of OGTT increased, the prevalence of macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] 1.059, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.029 - 1.090, p < 0.001) and hypertensive diseases (OR 1.106, 95% CI 1.064 - 1.149, p < 0.001) also increased. For patients with same levels of AUC values, no significant differences in the risk of macrosomia, preterm birth and neonatal complications were observed between the GDM and non-GDM groups. Women with an AUC higher than 14.20 (mmol * h/L) had a higher risk of adverse outcomes regardless of the presence of GDM. Conclusions: The AUC could be a measure method of the severity of maternal hyperglycemia, and women with a high AUC should undergo aggressive management to avoid adverse outcomes regardless of the presence of GDM. Objective: We adopted the area under the curve (AUC) of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) as a measure method of the severity of maternal hyperglycemia and investigated its relationship with adverse perinatal outcomes among women with and without gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods: This is a retrospective cohort study. Our study group collected the medical records of 15,296 women who received perinatal care in 15 hospitals in Beijing and who delivered from July 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013. And several original articles on this cohort have been published. In this study, we analyze the relationship between AUC and adverse perinatal outcomes, so that in multiple pregnant cases, patients with pre-pregnancy diabetes, hypertension, and abnormal kidney function and those who did not receive a 75-g OGTT were excluded. A Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to determine the associations. Results: In total, 13,561 women were included. As the AUC of OGTT increased, the prevalence of macrosomia (odds ratio [OR] 1.059, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.029 - 1.090, p < 0.001) and hypertensive diseases (OR 1.106, 95% CI 1.064 - 1.149, p < 0.001) also increased. For patients with same levels of AUC values, no significant differences in the risk of macrosomia, preterm birth and neonatal complications were observed between the GDM and non-GDM groups. Women with an AUC higher than 14.20 (mmol * h/L) had a higher risk of adverse outcomes regardless of the presence of GDM. Conclusions: The AUC could be a measure method of the severity of maternal hyperglycemia, and women with a high AUC should undergo aggressive management to avoid adverse outcomes regardless of the presence of GDM.
出处 《Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology》 2019年第2期186-195,共10页 妇产科期刊(英文)
关键词 AUC GDM OGTT MEASURE Method HYPERGLYCEMIA AUC GDM OGTT Measure Method Hyperglycemia
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献96

  • 1International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups consensus panel. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 676-682.
  • 2American Diabetes Association. 2010. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care 2010; Suppl 1: s62-s69.
  • 3American Diabetes Association. 2010. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes--2010. Diabetes Care 2010; Suppll: s11-s61.
  • 4Disease Control Bureau of Ministry of Health, China. Guideline of Control and Prevention for overweight and obesity in Chinese adults. Beijing: People's Medical Publishing House; 2003: 1-49.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南[M],北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,1-20.
  • 6International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas 6th ed.[accessed 2013 November]. Available from: URL: http://www.idf.org/sites/default/files/EN_6E_Atlas_Full_0.pdf.
  • 7Sugiyama T, Kusaka H, Sagawa N, Toyoda N. Universal screeningtests for gestational diabetes mellitus in Japan. Diabetes andPregnancy 2006; 6: 7-12.
  • 8Evers IM, de Valk HW, Mol BW, ter Braak EW, Visser GH.Macrosomia despite good glycaemic control in Type I diabeticpregnancy; results of a nationwide study in The Netherlands.Diabetologia 2002; 45: 1484-1489 [PMID: 12436330 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-002-0958-7].
  • 9Lauenborg J, Mathiesen E, Ovesen P, Westergaard JG, Ekbom P,M-lsted-Pedersen L, Damm P. Audit on stillbirths in women withpregestational type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 1385-1389[PMID: 12716793 DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1385].
  • 10Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams D. Type 2 diabetesmellitus after gestational diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis.Lancet 2009; 373: 1773-1779 [PMID: 19465232 DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60731-5].

共引文献139

同被引文献27

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部