摘要
In the management of UNESCO cultural sites of significant environmental importance, the erroneous assumption that the environment is independent of biological heritage often prevails. The mapping of phy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">l</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ogenetic resources in the ancient city Matera-Sassi (MS) and the multivariable analysis at the level of ecotope and habitat have made it possible to identify the consistency of the plant genetic heritage and the biogenetic associations between the different ecotopes through the species they host. The bioclimatic variables and geomorphology of MS define an ecological niche refuge for rare or absent species in the surrounding landscape (e.g., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campanula</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>versicolor</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Centranthus</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>ruber</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (L.) Dc., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Capparis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">spinosa</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cymbalaria</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>muralis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Hill, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Crepis</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> spp., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lavathera</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>arborea</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L.) The total floristic capital in MS amounts to 190 species belonging to 59 different botanical families;80% are native species and only 4% are invasive. About half are Mediterranean with a moderate presence (17%) of cosmopolitan and sub-cosmopolitan;5% are endemic species. Autogenic ecotopes (Type I) represented by “Pleistocene limestone” and “House wall” contribute to the variation of total biodiversity through Endemic species mainly Chamephytes;anthropogenic ecotopes (Type III) such as “Garden” and “Town boundary” with Archaeophytes and exotic Neophytes mainly Phanerophytes;while “Humid margins” and mixed ecotope</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s (Type II) are linked to feral species and mainly to hemi-cr</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">y</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ptophytes and therophytes. Minimum spanning tree of the habitat features</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> traced by the floristic biological heritage is consistent with the pedogenetic relationships between primary mother rocks, their derived ecotopes and anthropogenic impacts. Ecotope ranking based on its biodiversity value indicates that appropriate simultaneous conservation of both genetic resources and human works is achievable.
In the management of UNESCO cultural sites of significant environmental importance, the erroneous assumption that the environment is independent of biological heritage often prevails. The mapping of phy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">l</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ogenetic resources in the ancient city Matera-Sassi (MS) and the multivariable analysis at the level of ecotope and habitat have made it possible to identify the consistency of the plant genetic heritage and the biogenetic associations between the different ecotopes through the species they host. The bioclimatic variables and geomorphology of MS define an ecological niche refuge for rare or absent species in the surrounding landscape (e.g., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campanula</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>versicolor</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Centranthus</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>ruber</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (L.) Dc., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Capparis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">spinosa</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cymbalaria</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>muralis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Hill, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Crepis</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> spp., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lavathera</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>arborea</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L.) The total floristic capital in MS amounts to 190 species belonging to 59 different botanical families;80% are native species and only 4% are invasive. About half are Mediterranean with a moderate presence (17%) of cosmopolitan and sub-cosmopolitan;5% are endemic species. Autogenic ecotopes (Type I) represented by “Pleistocene limestone” and “House wall” contribute to the variation of total biodiversity through Endemic species mainly Chamephytes;anthropogenic ecotopes (Type III) such as “Garden” and “Town boundary” with Archaeophytes and exotic Neophytes mainly Phanerophytes;while “Humid margins” and mixed ecotope</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s (Type II) are linked to feral species and mainly to hemi-cr</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">y</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ptophytes and therophytes. Minimum spanning tree of the habitat features</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> traced by the floristic biological heritage is consistent with the pedogenetic relationships between primary mother rocks, their derived ecotopes and anthropogenic impacts. Ecotope ranking based on its biodiversity value indicates that appropriate simultaneous conservation of both genetic resources and human works is achievable.
作者
Giovanni Figliuolo
Mario Nuzzi
Giovanni Figliuolo;Mario Nuzzi(Dipartimento di Culture Europee e del Mediterraneo (DiCEM), Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Matera, Italy)
