2500 chickens were treated intwo households （A and B）, and divided into a test group and a contrast group in each of the households. 0.5% of ＂Cumian No.l＂ was added to the feeds of 1- to 15-day-olds of the test gr...2500 chickens were treated intwo households （A and B）, and divided into a test group and a contrast group in each of the households. 0.5% of ＂Cumian No.l＂ was added to the feeds of 1- to 15-day-olds of the test group and 0.2% to the feeds of 16- to 44-day-olds of the test group. The result showed that compared with the contrast group, the average weight and survival rate increased by 4.786% and 2% respectively, and FIG decreased by 9.2% in the test group in household A; the average weight and survival rate increased by 3.608% and 2% respectively, and FIG decreased by 14.9% in the test group in household B.展开更多
文摘2500 chickens were treated intwo households （A and B）, and divided into a test group and a contrast group in each of the households. 0.5% of ＂Cumian No.l＂ was added to the feeds of 1- to 15-day-olds of the test group and 0.2% to the feeds of 16- to 44-day-olds of the test group. The result showed that compared with the contrast group, the average weight and survival rate increased by 4.786% and 2% respectively, and FIG decreased by 9.2% in the test group in household A; the average weight and survival rate increased by 3.608% and 2% respectively, and FIG decreased by 14.9% in the test group in household B.
