译者按:这里译出的两篇论文,即威廉·L.马伯里的《论宪法修改权的限制》(The Limitations upon the Amending Power)与威廉·L.佛雷尔森的《论美国宪法的修改:答马伯里先生》(Amending the Constitution of the United States—...译者按:这里译出的两篇论文,即威廉·L.马伯里的《论宪法修改权的限制》(The Limitations upon the Amending Power)与威廉·L.佛雷尔森的《论美国宪法的修改:答马伯里先生》(Amending the Constitution of the United States—A Reply to Mr.Marbury),可以说是美国宪法学说史上第一次就修宪权限制问题展开的直接交锋,具有一定的学术意义。马伯里是美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市的一名律师,主张修宪权存在内在的限制,宪法的修改不能有违于宪法的原则和精神。佛雷尔森乃是当时美国助理司法部长,主张除了宪法的明文规定外,不存在对修宪权的其他限制。值得一提的是,展开更多
According to constitutional jurisprudence in China,Article 51 of the Constitution is an unenumerated restrictive clause.Such theoretical construction fails to justify the differentiated restrictions established in the...According to constitutional jurisprudence in China,Article 51 of the Constitution is an unenumerated restrictive clause.Such theoretical construction fails to justify the differentiated restrictions established in the Constitution and makes it difficult to explain the constitutional status of human dignity. Article 51 implies the possibility of other theoretical constructions. It is not an unenumerated restriction clause but an unenumerated rights clause. It aims to provide guarantees for general freedom of action not enumerated in the Constitution rather than restricting fundamental rights. The actual benefit of this kind of theoretical construction lies in that it can establish the basis of the constitutional text for general freedom of action and promote the people’s correct understanding of the model of restriction on fundamental rights established by the Constitution of PRC.展开更多
基金Projects(51974225,52274063,52304154,52104148)supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of ChinaProject(2022JQ-401)supported by the Natural Science Basic Research Program of Shaanxi Province of ChinaProject(21JP077)supported by Scientific Research Project of Youth Innovation Team Construction of Shaanxi Provincial Department of Education。
文摘译者按:这里译出的两篇论文,即威廉·L.马伯里的《论宪法修改权的限制》(The Limitations upon the Amending Power)与威廉·L.佛雷尔森的《论美国宪法的修改:答马伯里先生》(Amending the Constitution of the United States—A Reply to Mr.Marbury),可以说是美国宪法学说史上第一次就修宪权限制问题展开的直接交锋,具有一定的学术意义。马伯里是美国马里兰州巴尔的摩市的一名律师,主张修宪权存在内在的限制,宪法的修改不能有违于宪法的原则和精神。佛雷尔森乃是当时美国助理司法部长,主张除了宪法的明文规定外,不存在对修宪权的其他限制。值得一提的是,
基金a phased achievement of Constitutional Interpretation in Line with Law and Its Practical Research,a General Project of Humanities and Social Sciences Research of the Ministry of Education for 2019 (Approval No. 19YJA820008)。
文摘According to constitutional jurisprudence in China,Article 51 of the Constitution is an unenumerated restrictive clause.Such theoretical construction fails to justify the differentiated restrictions established in the Constitution and makes it difficult to explain the constitutional status of human dignity. Article 51 implies the possibility of other theoretical constructions. It is not an unenumerated restriction clause but an unenumerated rights clause. It aims to provide guarantees for general freedom of action not enumerated in the Constitution rather than restricting fundamental rights. The actual benefit of this kind of theoretical construction lies in that it can establish the basis of the constitutional text for general freedom of action and promote the people’s correct understanding of the model of restriction on fundamental rights established by the Constitution of PRC.
