BACKGROUND Indications to refer patients with cirrhosis for liver transplant evaluation(LTE)include hepatic decompensation or a model for end stage liver disease(MELDNa)score≥15.Few studies have evaluated how delayin...BACKGROUND Indications to refer patients with cirrhosis for liver transplant evaluation(LTE)include hepatic decompensation or a model for end stage liver disease(MELDNa)score≥15.Few studies have evaluated how delaying referral beyond these criteria affects patient outcomes.AIM To evaluate clinical characteristics of patients undergoing inpatient LTE and to assess the effects of delayed LTE on patient outcomes(death,transplantation).METHODS This is a single center retrospective cohort study assessing all patients undergoing inpatient LTE(n=159)at a large quaternary care and liver transplant center between 10/23/2017-7/31/2021.Delayed referral was defined as having prior indication(decompensation,MELD-Na≥15)for LTE without referral.Early referral was defined as referrals made within 3 mo of having an indication based on practice guidelines.Logistic regression and Cox Hazard Regression were used to evaluate the relationship between delayed referral and patient outcomes.RESULTS Many patients who require expedited inpatient LTE had delayed referrals.Misconceptions regarding transplant candidacy were a leading cause of delayed referral.Ultimately,delayed referrals negatively affected overall patient outcome and an independent predictor of both death and not receiving a transplant.Delayed referral was associated with a 2.5 hazard risk of death.CONCLUSION Beyond initial access to an liver transplant(LT)center,delaying LTE increases risk of death and reduces risk of LT in patients with chronic liver disease.There is substantial opportunity to increase the percentage of patients undergoing LTE when first clinically indicated.It is crucial for providers to remain informed about the latest guidelines on liver transplant candidacy and the transplant referral process.展开更多
BACKGROUND The Karnofsky Performance Status(KPS)scale has been widely validated for clinical practice for over 60 years.AIM To examine the extent to which poor pre-transplant functional status,assessed using the KPS s...BACKGROUND The Karnofsky Performance Status(KPS)scale has been widely validated for clinical practice for over 60 years.AIM To examine the extent to which poor pre-transplant functional status,assessed using the KPS scale,is associated with increased risk of mortality and/or graft failure at 1-year post-transplantation.METHODS This study included 38278 United States adults who underwent first,non-urgent,liver-only transplantation from 2005 to 2014(Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients).Functional impairment/disability was categorized as severe,moderate,or none/normal.Analyses were conducted using multivariableadjusted Cox survival regression models.RESULTS The median age was 56 years,31%were women,median pre-transplant Model for End-Stage for Liver Disease score was 18.Functional impairment was present in 70%;one-quarter of the sample was severely disabled.After controlling for key recipient and donor factors,moderately and severely disabled patients had a 1-year mortality rate of 1.32[confidence interval(CI):1.21-1.44]and 1.73(95%CI:1.56-1.91)compared to patients with no impairment,respectively.Subjects with moderate and severe disability also had a multivariable-adjusted 1-year graft failure rate of 1.13(CI:1.02-1.24)and 1.16(CI:1.02-1.31),respectively.CONCLUSION Pre-transplant functional status is a useful prognostic indicator for 1-year posttransplant patient and graft survival.展开更多
To the Editor:Complete traumatic transection of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava(IVC)has almost invariably a fatal outcome.There are very few cases in the literature of patients that survived this type of injury.He...To the Editor:Complete traumatic transection of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava(IVC)has almost invariably a fatal outcome.There are very few cases in the literature of patients that survived this type of injury.Here we presented a case that was approached multidisciplinary(trauma surgeon,liver transplant surgeon,perfusionist,anesthesiologist,and cardiac surgeon)with a successful outcome including early recovery of all body functions and quality of life.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Indications to refer patients with cirrhosis for liver transplant evaluation(LTE)include hepatic decompensation or a model for end stage liver disease(MELDNa)score≥15.Few studies have evaluated how delaying referral beyond these criteria affects patient outcomes.AIM To evaluate clinical characteristics of patients undergoing inpatient LTE and to assess the effects of delayed LTE on patient outcomes(death,transplantation).METHODS This is a single center retrospective cohort study assessing all patients undergoing inpatient LTE(n=159)at a large quaternary care and liver transplant center between 10/23/2017-7/31/2021.Delayed referral was defined as having prior indication(decompensation,MELD-Na≥15)for LTE without referral.Early referral was defined as referrals made within 3 mo of having an indication based on practice guidelines.Logistic regression and Cox Hazard Regression were used to evaluate the relationship between delayed referral and patient outcomes.RESULTS Many patients who require expedited inpatient LTE had delayed referrals.Misconceptions regarding transplant candidacy were a leading cause of delayed referral.Ultimately,delayed referrals negatively affected overall patient outcome and an independent predictor of both death and not receiving a transplant.Delayed referral was associated with a 2.5 hazard risk of death.CONCLUSION Beyond initial access to an liver transplant(LT)center,delaying LTE increases risk of death and reduces risk of LT in patients with chronic liver disease.There is substantial opportunity to increase the percentage of patients undergoing LTE when first clinically indicated.It is crucial for providers to remain informed about the latest guidelines on liver transplant candidacy and the transplant referral process.
文摘BACKGROUND The Karnofsky Performance Status(KPS)scale has been widely validated for clinical practice for over 60 years.AIM To examine the extent to which poor pre-transplant functional status,assessed using the KPS scale,is associated with increased risk of mortality and/or graft failure at 1-year post-transplantation.METHODS This study included 38278 United States adults who underwent first,non-urgent,liver-only transplantation from 2005 to 2014(Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients).Functional impairment/disability was categorized as severe,moderate,or none/normal.Analyses were conducted using multivariableadjusted Cox survival regression models.RESULTS The median age was 56 years,31%were women,median pre-transplant Model for End-Stage for Liver Disease score was 18.Functional impairment was present in 70%;one-quarter of the sample was severely disabled.After controlling for key recipient and donor factors,moderately and severely disabled patients had a 1-year mortality rate of 1.32[confidence interval(CI):1.21-1.44]and 1.73(95%CI:1.56-1.91)compared to patients with no impairment,respectively.Subjects with moderate and severe disability also had a multivariable-adjusted 1-year graft failure rate of 1.13(CI:1.02-1.24)and 1.16(CI:1.02-1.31),respectively.CONCLUSION Pre-transplant functional status is a useful prognostic indicator for 1-year posttransplant patient and graft survival.
基金supported by a grant from the National Insti-tutes of Health(NIH)(T32GM107000)。
文摘To the Editor:Complete traumatic transection of the suprahepatic inferior vena cava(IVC)has almost invariably a fatal outcome.There are very few cases in the literature of patients that survived this type of injury.Here we presented a case that was approached multidisciplinary(trauma surgeon,liver transplant surgeon,perfusionist,anesthesiologist,and cardiac surgeon)with a successful outcome including early recovery of all body functions and quality of life.
