AIM： To investigate the incidence of KIT immunohostochemical staining in （GI） stromal tumors （GISTs）, and to analyze the clinical manifestations of the tumors and prognostic indicators. METHODS： We retrospective...AIM： To investigate the incidence of KIT immunohostochemical staining in （GI） stromal tumors （GISTs）, and to analyze the clinical manifestations of the tumors and prognostic indicators. METHODS： We retrospectively analyzed 50 cases of previously diagnosed GISTs. Tissue samples were assessed with KIT （CDl17 antigen）, CD34, SMA, desmin, S-100, NSE, PCNA, Ki-67, and BCL-2 for immunohistochemical study and pathological characteristics were analyzed for prognostic factors. RESULTS： Fifteen tumors （30%） were negative in KIT staining. A significant association was observed between gender （male patients： 14/15） and KIT-negative staining （P = 0.003）.The patients＇s mean age was 56.6 years. Tumors developed in stomach （n = 8）, small intestine （n = 5）, large intestine （n = 1） and oesophagus （n = 1）. The mean tumor size was 5.72 cm. The mitotic count ranged from 0-29/50 HPF （mean： 3.4） and 73% of tumors showed no necrosis. The majority of the tumors （67%） had dual or epithelioid differentiation. Tumors were classified as very low or low risk （n = 7）, intermediate risk （n = 5）, and high risk （n = 3） groups. Twelve （80%） patients were alive without evidence of residual tumor for an average period of 40.25 mo （12-82 too）; three patients developed metastatic disease to the liver and eventually died within 2-12 mo （median survival： 8.6 too）.CONCLUSION： A small subgroup of GISTs fulfils the clinical and morphological criteria of these tumors, and lacks KIT expression. These tumors predominantly developed in the stomach, being dual or epithelioid in morphology, which are classified as low risk tumors and presented a better survival status than KIT-positive tumors. The ability to diagnose GISTs still depends on immunohistochemical staining but the research should extend in gene mutations.展开更多
基金Supported by Hellenic State Scholarship Foundation, Department of Science Promotion, No. 19366/2005
文摘AIM： To investigate the incidence of KIT immunohostochemical staining in （GI） stromal tumors （GISTs）, and to analyze the clinical manifestations of the tumors and prognostic indicators. METHODS： We retrospectively analyzed 50 cases of previously diagnosed GISTs. Tissue samples were assessed with KIT （CDl17 antigen）, CD34, SMA, desmin, S-100, NSE, PCNA, Ki-67, and BCL-2 for immunohistochemical study and pathological characteristics were analyzed for prognostic factors. RESULTS： Fifteen tumors （30%） were negative in KIT staining. A significant association was observed between gender （male patients： 14/15） and KIT-negative staining （P = 0.003）.The patients＇s mean age was 56.6 years. Tumors developed in stomach （n = 8）, small intestine （n = 5）, large intestine （n = 1） and oesophagus （n = 1）. The mean tumor size was 5.72 cm. The mitotic count ranged from 0-29/50 HPF （mean： 3.4） and 73% of tumors showed no necrosis. The majority of the tumors （67%） had dual or epithelioid differentiation. Tumors were classified as very low or low risk （n = 7）, intermediate risk （n = 5）, and high risk （n = 3） groups. Twelve （80%） patients were alive without evidence of residual tumor for an average period of 40.25 mo （12-82 too）; three patients developed metastatic disease to the liver and eventually died within 2-12 mo （median survival： 8.6 too）.CONCLUSION： A small subgroup of GISTs fulfils the clinical and morphological criteria of these tumors, and lacks KIT expression. These tumors predominantly developed in the stomach, being dual or epithelioid in morphology, which are classified as low risk tumors and presented a better survival status than KIT-positive tumors. The ability to diagnose GISTs still depends on immunohistochemical staining but the research should extend in gene mutations.
