Aim: To comparatively evaluate the efficacy and post-operative complications of the Madigan's prostatectomy(MPC) and suprapubic prostatectomy (SPPC). Methods: A total of 43 patients with benign prostatic hyperplas...Aim: To comparatively evaluate the efficacy and post-operative complications of the Madigan's prostatectomy(MPC) and suprapubic prostatectomy (SPPC). Methods: A total of 43 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasiawere divided into two groups: 21 underwent MPC and 22, SPPC. In all the patients, the international prostate symp-tom score (IPSS) and urinary pressure-flow studies were assessed before and 6 months after operation. The InternationalContinence Society (ICS) nomogram, Abrams-Griffiths (AG) number and linear passive urethral resistance relationanalysis (L-PURR) were used to diagnose and grade bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The IPSS and the urodynamicparameters before and after operation, as well as the advantages and post-operative complications were recorded andcompared. Results: Patients of both the MPC and SPPC groups had a significant improvement in IPSS and urody-namic parameters. Obstruction was relieved in 81.0% of MPC and 86.4% of SPPC patients. MPC has the advantagesof the absence of postoperative hematuria and post-catheter stricture, a shorter period of hospitalization, and lower inci-dence of retrograde ejaculation and erectile dysfunction. Conclusion: Both MPC and SPPC can effectively relieveBOO. MPC has certain advantages and a lower incidence of complications as compared with SPPC. (Asian J Androl2001 Mar; 3: 33-37)展开更多
文摘Aim: To comparatively evaluate the efficacy and post-operative complications of the Madigan's prostatectomy(MPC) and suprapubic prostatectomy (SPPC). Methods: A total of 43 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasiawere divided into two groups: 21 underwent MPC and 22, SPPC. In all the patients, the international prostate symp-tom score (IPSS) and urinary pressure-flow studies were assessed before and 6 months after operation. The InternationalContinence Society (ICS) nomogram, Abrams-Griffiths (AG) number and linear passive urethral resistance relationanalysis (L-PURR) were used to diagnose and grade bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). The IPSS and the urodynamicparameters before and after operation, as well as the advantages and post-operative complications were recorded andcompared. Results: Patients of both the MPC and SPPC groups had a significant improvement in IPSS and urody-namic parameters. Obstruction was relieved in 81.0% of MPC and 86.4% of SPPC patients. MPC has the advantagesof the absence of postoperative hematuria and post-catheter stricture, a shorter period of hospitalization, and lower inci-dence of retrograde ejaculation and erectile dysfunction. Conclusion: Both MPC and SPPC can effectively relieveBOO. MPC has certain advantages and a lower incidence of complications as compared with SPPC. (Asian J Androl2001 Mar; 3: 33-37)
