Objective:To compare the effects of adding rocuronium and nitroglycerin to ropivacaine in intravenous regional anesthesia(IVRA)on pain and hemodynamic parameters.Methods:This randomized controlled trial was done in 20...Objective:To compare the effects of adding rocuronium and nitroglycerin to ropivacaine in intravenous regional anesthesia(IVRA)on pain and hemodynamic parameters.Methods:This randomized controlled trial was done in 2023.Participants were 177 candidates for forearm operation surgery under IVRA selected from Valiasr Hospital,Arak,Iran.They were allocated by block randomization to three different groups,namely nitroglycerin group,rocuronium group and control group.Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before tourniquet application up to postoperative recovery time.Sensory block and motor block onset and duration and pain were also evaluated.The data analysis was carried out by IMB SPSS software 20.0.Results:177 Eligible patients were included in study,with 59 in each group.Time to sensory and motor block onset in the nitroglycerin group was significantly less than the other groups and the time of motor block in the rocuronium group was statistically higher than the control and the nitroglycerin groups(P<0.001).Seven participants in the nitroglycerin group experienced headache and three from the rocuronium group experienced dizziness.The side effects occurrence in the nitroglycerin group was more prevalent than in the control and rocuronium groups(P=0.009).Conclusions:Nitroglycerin significantly reduces the time to sensory and motor block onset,while rocuronium is more effective in prolonging the time of motor block.Although there is no difference between nitroglycerin and rocuronium respecting the pain score and opioid need administration,nitroglycerin is associated with a higher prevalence of medication side effects.Therefore,both nitroglycerin and rocuronium can be used as adjuvant for IVRA.The final choice relies on patients’conditions and anesthesiologists’judgment.展开更多
Objective:To compare the effect of ketamine,lidocaine,acetaminophen,and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery.Methods:This double-blind cli...Objective:To compare the effect of ketamine,lidocaine,acetaminophen,and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery.Methods:This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery.Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group,the lidocaine group,the acetaminophen group,and the dexmedetomidine group.The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure,and arterial SaO2,alongside visual analog scale pain scores,sedation assessed by Ramsay score,nausea and vomiting,and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups.Results:This study included 140 patients,aged 37(32,41)years,with 92 males and 48 females,and each group had 35 patients.Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery,decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery,and more satisfactory sedation(P<0.05).Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores,or nausea and vomiting among the groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine,lidocaine,and acetaminophen for pain control,but the final choice hinges on the patients’physical condition and the anesthesiologist's preference.Clinical registration:It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.展开更多
Objective:To compare effect of intrathecal meperidine,tramadol,magnesium sulfate,and dexmedetomidine on the prevention of post-spinal anesthesia shivering and adverse events in hip fracture repair patients.Methods:In ...Objective:To compare effect of intrathecal meperidine,tramadol,magnesium sulfate,and dexmedetomidine on the prevention of post-spinal anesthesia shivering and adverse events in hip fracture repair patients.Methods:In a randomized,double-blind trial,132 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA)ⅠandⅡspinal anesthesia who needed hip fracture surgery were enrolled.Patients were stratified into 4 intervention groups based on a randomized block pattern:meperidine,tramadol,magnesium sulfate,and dexmedetomidine.Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure,heart rate,and oxygen saturation,as well as the severity of shivering,core body temperature,Ramsay sedation score,adverse events,meperidine consumption were recorded and compared.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the normal hemodynamic parameters,temperature,duration of surgery,meperidine consumption,and adverse events such as dizziness,hypotension,nausea,and bradycardia among groups(P>0.05).Compared to other groups,severity of shivering was the lower in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 8 h after surgery.The Ramsay sedation scores were higher in the dexmedetomidine and meperidine groups 4 h after surgery(P=0.020).Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine acts better than the other three adjuvants in reducing complications such as shivering.Overall,these four adjuvants are helpful to prevent postoperative shivering and could be put forward as promising local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia,based on anesthesiologists’discretion and patients’general conditions.Clinical registration:The study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee at the Valiasr Hospital(Arak,Iran)with the clinical trial code of IRCT20141209020258N153.展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficacy of midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to intrathecal bupivacaine on both block characteristics and postoperative analgesia in knee arthroplasty.Methods:This randomi...Objective:To compare the efficacy of midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to intrathecal bupivacaine on both block characteristics and postoperative analgesia in knee arthroplasty.Methods:This randomized double-blind clinical trial recruited spinal anesthesia patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classⅠorⅡ,who needed knee arthroplasty.Patients were stratified into three intervention groups,including the midazolam group,the fentanyl group,and the magnesium sulfate group,and the patients were administered with midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate,respectively.Hemodynamic parameters,sensory and motor block,and pain score(Visual Analogue Scale)were measured and compared among the three groups.Results:A total of 105 patients were included in this study with 35 patients in each group.There was no statistically significant difference in terms of oxygen saturation,mean blood pressure,duration of surgery,and postoperative complications,including nausea,vomiting,bradycardia,dizziness,and hypotension,as well as the time of opioid administration among the three groups(P>0.05).Statistically significant differences were found in terms of heart rate at 15,30,45,60,75,and 105 min after beginning of operation among the three groups,which was lower in the midazolam group(P<0.05).The midazolam group showed a shorter time to achieve sensory block after spinal anesthesia,sensory block to T8 or higher and sensory block to T12 and L1(P<0.05).Besides,the three groups showed significantly differences in terms of onset of motor block after spinal anesthesia and time to achieve motor block to T8 or higher or Bromage score 3(P=0.001).No significant difference was noted in pain scores among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Midazolam resulted in a shorter time to achieve sensory and motor block to T8 or higher,the onset of motor block and sensory block after spinal anesthesia,and time to achieve sensory block to T12 and L1,and the pain scores were not significantly different among the groups.Thus,midazolam can be highly underlined,if a shorter onset of sensory and motor blocks is targeted.[Funded by the research deputy of Arak University of Medical Sciences(No.99258);fa.irct.ir number,IRCT20141209020258N164].展开更多
基金approved by the Ethics Committee of Arak University of Medical Sciences,Arak,Iran(No.IR.ARAKMU.REC.1402.033)registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials(No.IRCT20141209020258N183).
文摘Objective:To compare the effects of adding rocuronium and nitroglycerin to ropivacaine in intravenous regional anesthesia(IVRA)on pain and hemodynamic parameters.Methods:This randomized controlled trial was done in 2023.Participants were 177 candidates for forearm operation surgery under IVRA selected from Valiasr Hospital,Arak,Iran.They were allocated by block randomization to three different groups,namely nitroglycerin group,rocuronium group and control group.Hemodynamic parameters were recorded before tourniquet application up to postoperative recovery time.Sensory block and motor block onset and duration and pain were also evaluated.The data analysis was carried out by IMB SPSS software 20.0.Results:177 Eligible patients were included in study,with 59 in each group.Time to sensory and motor block onset in the nitroglycerin group was significantly less than the other groups and the time of motor block in the rocuronium group was statistically higher than the control and the nitroglycerin groups(P<0.001).Seven participants in the nitroglycerin group experienced headache and three from the rocuronium group experienced dizziness.The side effects occurrence in the nitroglycerin group was more prevalent than in the control and rocuronium groups(P=0.009).Conclusions:Nitroglycerin significantly reduces the time to sensory and motor block onset,while rocuronium is more effective in prolonging the time of motor block.Although there is no difference between nitroglycerin and rocuronium respecting the pain score and opioid need administration,nitroglycerin is associated with a higher prevalence of medication side effects.Therefore,both nitroglycerin and rocuronium can be used as adjuvant for IVRA.The final choice relies on patients’conditions and anesthesiologists’judgment.
文摘Objective:To compare the effect of ketamine,lidocaine,acetaminophen,and dexmedetomidine combined with morphine patient-controlled analgesia for opium addicts after tibial fracture surgery.Methods:This double-blind clinical trial included opium-addicted patients undergoing tibia fracture surgery.Patients were recruited and randomized to four different groups including the ketamine group,the lidocaine group,the acetaminophen group,and the dexmedetomidine group.The hemodynamic parameters such as heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure,and arterial SaO2,alongside visual analog scale pain scores,sedation assessed by Ramsay score,nausea and vomiting,and opioid use were recorded and compared among the four groups.Results:This study included 140 patients,aged 37(32,41)years,with 92 males and 48 females,and each group had 35 patients.Dexmedetomidine-sedated subjects had the lowest blood pressure from 1 to 24 h after surgery,decreased HR at 12 and 24 h after surgery,and more satisfactory sedation(P<0.05).Notwithstanding no significant difference was noted in the pain scores,or nausea and vomiting among the groups(P>0.05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine has a better sedation effect compared to ketamine,lidocaine,and acetaminophen for pain control,but the final choice hinges on the patients’physical condition and the anesthesiologist's preference.Clinical registration:It is registered in Iranian Registry Clinical Trial by code IRCT20141209020258N146.
文摘Objective:To compare effect of intrathecal meperidine,tramadol,magnesium sulfate,and dexmedetomidine on the prevention of post-spinal anesthesia shivering and adverse events in hip fracture repair patients.Methods:In a randomized,double-blind trial,132 patients with American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA)ⅠandⅡspinal anesthesia who needed hip fracture surgery were enrolled.Patients were stratified into 4 intervention groups based on a randomized block pattern:meperidine,tramadol,magnesium sulfate,and dexmedetomidine.Hemodynamic parameters including blood pressure,heart rate,and oxygen saturation,as well as the severity of shivering,core body temperature,Ramsay sedation score,adverse events,meperidine consumption were recorded and compared.Results:There was no statistically significant difference in the normal hemodynamic parameters,temperature,duration of surgery,meperidine consumption,and adverse events such as dizziness,hypotension,nausea,and bradycardia among groups(P>0.05).Compared to other groups,severity of shivering was the lower in the dexmedetomidine group 6 and 8 h after surgery.The Ramsay sedation scores were higher in the dexmedetomidine and meperidine groups 4 h after surgery(P=0.020).Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine acts better than the other three adjuvants in reducing complications such as shivering.Overall,these four adjuvants are helpful to prevent postoperative shivering and could be put forward as promising local anesthetics in spinal anesthesia,based on anesthesiologists’discretion and patients’general conditions.Clinical registration:The study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee at the Valiasr Hospital(Arak,Iran)with the clinical trial code of IRCT20141209020258N153.
基金funded by the research deputy of Arak University of Medical Sciences(No.99258).
文摘Objective:To compare the efficacy of midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate as adjuvants to intrathecal bupivacaine on both block characteristics and postoperative analgesia in knee arthroplasty.Methods:This randomized double-blind clinical trial recruited spinal anesthesia patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists classⅠorⅡ,who needed knee arthroplasty.Patients were stratified into three intervention groups,including the midazolam group,the fentanyl group,and the magnesium sulfate group,and the patients were administered with midazolam,fentanyl,and magnesium sulfate,respectively.Hemodynamic parameters,sensory and motor block,and pain score(Visual Analogue Scale)were measured and compared among the three groups.Results:A total of 105 patients were included in this study with 35 patients in each group.There was no statistically significant difference in terms of oxygen saturation,mean blood pressure,duration of surgery,and postoperative complications,including nausea,vomiting,bradycardia,dizziness,and hypotension,as well as the time of opioid administration among the three groups(P>0.05).Statistically significant differences were found in terms of heart rate at 15,30,45,60,75,and 105 min after beginning of operation among the three groups,which was lower in the midazolam group(P<0.05).The midazolam group showed a shorter time to achieve sensory block after spinal anesthesia,sensory block to T8 or higher and sensory block to T12 and L1(P<0.05).Besides,the three groups showed significantly differences in terms of onset of motor block after spinal anesthesia and time to achieve motor block to T8 or higher or Bromage score 3(P=0.001).No significant difference was noted in pain scores among the three groups(P>0.05).Conclusion:Midazolam resulted in a shorter time to achieve sensory and motor block to T8 or higher,the onset of motor block and sensory block after spinal anesthesia,and time to achieve sensory block to T12 and L1,and the pain scores were not significantly different among the groups.Thus,midazolam can be highly underlined,if a shorter onset of sensory and motor blocks is targeted.[Funded by the research deputy of Arak University of Medical Sciences(No.99258);fa.irct.ir number,IRCT20141209020258N164].
