This paper aims to interpret the connotation of high-quality development of tourism economy(HQTE)from the perspective of the new development concepts of innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing,and then to e...This paper aims to interpret the connotation of high-quality development of tourism economy(HQTE)from the perspective of the new development concepts of innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing,and then to evaluate the spatial differenti-ation of China’s HQTE based on provincial panel data from 2009 to 2018.Specifically,we employ the spatial convergence model to ex-plore the absolute and conditionalβconvergence trends of HQTE in the whole country and the eastern,central and western regions of China.Our empirical results reveal that:1)within the decade,from 2009 to 2018,regions of China with the highest HQTE index is its eastern region followed by the central region and then the western region,but the fastest growing one is the western region of China fol-lowed by the central region and then the eastern region.2)Whether or not the spatial effect is included,there are absolute and condition-alβconvergence in HQTE in the whole country and aforementioned three regions.3)The degree of government attention as well as the level of economic development and location accessibility are the positive driving factors for the convergence of HQTE in the whole country and the three regions.The degree of marketization and human capital have not passed the significance test either in the whole country or in the three regions.The above conclusions could deepen the understanding of the regional imbalance and spatial conver-gence characteristics of HQTE,clarify the primary development objects,and accomplish the goal of China’s HQTE.展开更多
目的调查脑卒中溶栓患者院前调度与转运情况,比较开展卒中中心认证进行院前救治质量改善策略前后的溶栓患者获得急救资源的差异及对溶栓结局的影响。方法选取2017年7月—2018年6月(卒中中心认证前)通过EMS救治的97例接受溶栓治疗的缺血...目的调查脑卒中溶栓患者院前调度与转运情况,比较开展卒中中心认证进行院前救治质量改善策略前后的溶栓患者获得急救资源的差异及对溶栓结局的影响。方法选取2017年7月—2018年6月(卒中中心认证前)通过EMS救治的97例接受溶栓治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者为常规组,选取2018年8月—2019年6月(卒中中心认证后)通过EMS救治的123例接受溶栓治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者为改善组。常规组采用院前救治措施,改善组在常规组基础上采用院前救治改善策略。比较2组患者在救治时间节点和临床结局方面的差异。结果改善组患者的调度中心派车时间、EMS反应时间、EMS现场时间、入院至静脉溶栓用药时间(door to needle time,DNT)、发病-治疗时间(onset to treatment time,OTT)均明显短于常规组(t=21.528,P<0.001;t=6.221,P<0.001;t=22.243,P<0.001;t=6.769,P<0.001;t=9.124,P<0.001);改善组预后良好率高于常规组(χ^(2)=4.936,P=0.026)。结论卒中优先派遣代码、初步评估,EMS分级响应、院前预警等一系列院前救治改善策略能有效缩短院前延误,改善缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓结局,值得应用推广。展开更多
基金Under the auspices of the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.42001156)。
文摘This paper aims to interpret the connotation of high-quality development of tourism economy(HQTE)from the perspective of the new development concepts of innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing,and then to evaluate the spatial differenti-ation of China’s HQTE based on provincial panel data from 2009 to 2018.Specifically,we employ the spatial convergence model to ex-plore the absolute and conditionalβconvergence trends of HQTE in the whole country and the eastern,central and western regions of China.Our empirical results reveal that:1)within the decade,from 2009 to 2018,regions of China with the highest HQTE index is its eastern region followed by the central region and then the western region,but the fastest growing one is the western region of China fol-lowed by the central region and then the eastern region.2)Whether or not the spatial effect is included,there are absolute and condition-alβconvergence in HQTE in the whole country and aforementioned three regions.3)The degree of government attention as well as the level of economic development and location accessibility are the positive driving factors for the convergence of HQTE in the whole country and the three regions.The degree of marketization and human capital have not passed the significance test either in the whole country or in the three regions.The above conclusions could deepen the understanding of the regional imbalance and spatial conver-gence characteristics of HQTE,clarify the primary development objects,and accomplish the goal of China’s HQTE.
文摘目的调查脑卒中溶栓患者院前调度与转运情况,比较开展卒中中心认证进行院前救治质量改善策略前后的溶栓患者获得急救资源的差异及对溶栓结局的影响。方法选取2017年7月—2018年6月(卒中中心认证前)通过EMS救治的97例接受溶栓治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者为常规组,选取2018年8月—2019年6月(卒中中心认证后)通过EMS救治的123例接受溶栓治疗的缺血性脑卒中患者为改善组。常规组采用院前救治措施,改善组在常规组基础上采用院前救治改善策略。比较2组患者在救治时间节点和临床结局方面的差异。结果改善组患者的调度中心派车时间、EMS反应时间、EMS现场时间、入院至静脉溶栓用药时间(door to needle time,DNT)、发病-治疗时间(onset to treatment time,OTT)均明显短于常规组(t=21.528,P<0.001;t=6.221,P<0.001;t=22.243,P<0.001;t=6.769,P<0.001;t=9.124,P<0.001);改善组预后良好率高于常规组(χ^(2)=4.936,P=0.026)。结论卒中优先派遣代码、初步评估,EMS分级响应、院前预警等一系列院前救治改善策略能有效缩短院前延误,改善缺血性脑卒中患者溶栓结局,值得应用推广。
