BACKGROUND In recent years,the emergence of multiplex technology that can simultaneously measure multiple anti-islet autoantibodies has become particularly valuable for the staging and early diagnosis of immune-mediat...BACKGROUND In recent years,the emergence of multiplex technology that can simultaneously measure multiple anti-islet autoantibodies has become particularly valuable for the staging and early diagnosis of immune-mediated type 1 diabetes(T1D).While it has been established that 20%-30%of T1D patients suffer from autoimmune thyroid disease(AITD),there is limited available data regarding the presence of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients.Among commercially available anti-islet autoantibodies,glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibodies(GADAs)are often the first marker measured in general clinical practice.AIM To investigate the frequency of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients.METHODS Our study involved four hundred ninety-five AITD patients,categorized into three distinct groups:AITD with T1D(n=18),AITD with phenotypic type 2 diabetes(T2D)(n=81),and AITD without diabetes(n=396),and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)was employed to determine the frequencies of 3 Screen Islet Cell Autoantibody(3 Screen ICA),GADA,insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies(IA-2As),and zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies(ZnT8As)within these groups.RESULTS The frequency of 3 Screen ICA in AITD patients with T1D,T2D,and those without diabetes were 88.9%,6.2%,and 5.1%,respectively,with no significant difference seen between the latter two groups.Notably,the frequency of 3 Screen ICA was 11.1%higher in AITD patients with T1D,1.3%higher in AITD patients with T2D,and 1.1%higher in AITD patients without diabetes compared to GADA,respectively.Furthermore,12.5%,20.0%,and 20.0%of the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients were negative for GADA.Additionally,1.3%of the AITD patients who tested negative for 3 Screen ICA in both the AITD with T2D and non-diabetic AITD groups were found to be positive for individual autoantibodies.Among the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients,there was a significantly higher proportion of individuals with multiple autoantibodies in AITD patients with T1D compared to those without diabetes(37.5%vs 5.0%,P<0.05).However,this proportion was similar to that in AITD patients with T2D(20.0%).Nevertheless,there was no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers between AITD patients with T1D and those without diabetes(436.8±66.4 vs 308.1±66.4 index).Additionally,no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers was observed between Graves’disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis in any of the groups.CONCLUSION Our findings reveal that some AITD patients without diabetes exhibit 3 Screen ICA titers comparable to those in AITD patients with T1D.Thus,3 Screen ICA outperforms GADA in identifying latent anti-islet autoantibody-positive individuals among AITD patients.展开更多
BACKGROUND Omarigliptin is one of several once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors(DPP-4is).Despite the high frequency of switching from various daily DPP-4is to omarigliptin in actual clinical practice,data rega...BACKGROUND Omarigliptin is one of several once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors(DPP-4is).Despite the high frequency of switching from various daily DPP-4is to omarigliptin in actual clinical practice,data regarding its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes(T2D)after switching are limited.AIM To analyze the efficacy of omarigliptin in Japanese patients with T2D who had previously received treatment with other glucose-lowering agents.METHODS Forty-nine T2D patients treated for the first time with omarigliptin were recruited retrospectively and divided into four groups defined as either add-on or switched from daily DPP-4is:switched from linagliptin,switched from sitagliptin,and switched from vildagliptin.During a 3-mo follow-up,the clinical parameters among these groups were assessed and compared,with the impact of the switch on glycemic variability as measured by continuous glucose monitoring also being evaluated in the switched groups.RESULTS Hemoglobin A1c levels saw a significant decrease of-0.32%±0.41%in the add-on group(P=0.002).However,the other groups’variables depended on the preswitch daily DPP-4i:switched from linagliptin,-0.05%±0.22%;switched from sitagliptin,-0.17%±0.33%;and switched from vildagliptin,0.45%±0.42%,which saw significant worsening(P=0.0007).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that switching from vildagliptin to omarigliptin was independently associated with worsening glycemic control(P=0.0013).The mean and standard deviation of sensor glucose value,the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions,and the mean of daily difference significantly improved when switching the patient from either linagliptin or sitagliptin to omarigliptin.However,in patients switched from vildagliptin,not only did the glucose variability indices see no improvements,the mean of daily difference even underwent significant worsening.CONCLUSION Administering omarigliptin as add-on therapy or switching to it from sitagliptin and linagliptin,but not vildagliptin,improves glycemic control and thus should help in decision making when selecting DPP-4is for T2D patients.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND In recent years,the emergence of multiplex technology that can simultaneously measure multiple anti-islet autoantibodies has become particularly valuable for the staging and early diagnosis of immune-mediated type 1 diabetes(T1D).While it has been established that 20%-30%of T1D patients suffer from autoimmune thyroid disease(AITD),there is limited available data regarding the presence of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients.Among commercially available anti-islet autoantibodies,glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 autoantibodies(GADAs)are often the first marker measured in general clinical practice.AIM To investigate the frequency of anti-islet autoantibodies in AITD patients.METHODS Our study involved four hundred ninety-five AITD patients,categorized into three distinct groups:AITD with T1D(n=18),AITD with phenotypic type 2 diabetes(T2D)(n=81),and AITD without diabetes(n=396),and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA)was employed to determine the frequencies of 3 Screen Islet Cell Autoantibody(3 Screen ICA),GADA,insulinoma-associated antigen-2 autoantibodies(IA-2As),and zinc transporter 8 autoantibodies(ZnT8As)within these groups.RESULTS The frequency of 3 Screen ICA in AITD patients with T1D,T2D,and those without diabetes were 88.9%,6.2%,and 5.1%,respectively,with no significant difference seen between the latter two groups.Notably,the frequency of 3 Screen ICA was 11.1%higher in AITD patients with T1D,1.3%higher in AITD patients with T2D,and 1.1%higher in AITD patients without diabetes compared to GADA,respectively.Furthermore,12.5%,20.0%,and 20.0%of the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients were negative for GADA.Additionally,1.3%of the AITD patients who tested negative for 3 Screen ICA in both the AITD with T2D and non-diabetic AITD groups were found to be positive for individual autoantibodies.Among the 3 Screen ICA-positive patients,there was a significantly higher proportion of individuals with multiple autoantibodies in AITD patients with T1D compared to those without diabetes(37.5%vs 5.0%,P<0.05).However,this proportion was similar to that in AITD patients with T2D(20.0%).Nevertheless,there was no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers between AITD patients with T1D and those without diabetes(436.8±66.4 vs 308.1±66.4 index).Additionally,no significant difference in 3 Screen ICA titers was observed between Graves’disease and Hashimoto’s thyroiditis in any of the groups.CONCLUSION Our findings reveal that some AITD patients without diabetes exhibit 3 Screen ICA titers comparable to those in AITD patients with T1D.Thus,3 Screen ICA outperforms GADA in identifying latent anti-islet autoantibody-positive individuals among AITD patients.
文摘BACKGROUND Omarigliptin is one of several once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors(DPP-4is).Despite the high frequency of switching from various daily DPP-4is to omarigliptin in actual clinical practice,data regarding its efficacy in patients with type 2 diabetes(T2D)after switching are limited.AIM To analyze the efficacy of omarigliptin in Japanese patients with T2D who had previously received treatment with other glucose-lowering agents.METHODS Forty-nine T2D patients treated for the first time with omarigliptin were recruited retrospectively and divided into four groups defined as either add-on or switched from daily DPP-4is:switched from linagliptin,switched from sitagliptin,and switched from vildagliptin.During a 3-mo follow-up,the clinical parameters among these groups were assessed and compared,with the impact of the switch on glycemic variability as measured by continuous glucose monitoring also being evaluated in the switched groups.RESULTS Hemoglobin A1c levels saw a significant decrease of-0.32%±0.41%in the add-on group(P=0.002).However,the other groups’variables depended on the preswitch daily DPP-4i:switched from linagliptin,-0.05%±0.22%;switched from sitagliptin,-0.17%±0.33%;and switched from vildagliptin,0.45%±0.42%,which saw significant worsening(P=0.0007).Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that switching from vildagliptin to omarigliptin was independently associated with worsening glycemic control(P=0.0013).The mean and standard deviation of sensor glucose value,the mean amplitude of glycemic excursions,and the mean of daily difference significantly improved when switching the patient from either linagliptin or sitagliptin to omarigliptin.However,in patients switched from vildagliptin,not only did the glucose variability indices see no improvements,the mean of daily difference even underwent significant worsening.CONCLUSION Administering omarigliptin as add-on therapy or switching to it from sitagliptin and linagliptin,but not vildagliptin,improves glycemic control and thus should help in decision making when selecting DPP-4is for T2D patients.
