StageⅣgastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths(1).Over the past few decades,advances in surgical techniq...StageⅣgastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths(1).Over the past few decades,advances in surgical techniques and chemotherapy have improved the prognosis for patients with gastric cancer.展开更多
AIM: To evaluate the nature of the 'learning curve' for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. METHODS: The data of 90 consecutive patients with ...AIM: To evaluate the nature of the 'learning curve' for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. METHODS: The data of 90 consecutive patients with early gastric cancer who underwent LADG with systemic lymphadenectomy between April 2003 and November 2004 were reviewed. The 90 patients were divided into 9 sequential groups of 10 cases in each group and the average operative time of these 9 groups were determined. Other learning indicators, such as transfusion requirements, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complication, time to first flatus, and postoperative hospital stay, were evaluated. RESULTS: After the first 10 LADGs, the operative time reached its first plateau (230-240 min/operation) and then reached a second plateau (＜200 min/operation) for the final 30 cases. Although a significant improvement in the operative time was noted after the first 50 cases, there were no significant differences in transfusion requirements, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complications, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay between the groups. CONCLUSION: Based on operative time analysis, this study show that experience of 50 cases of LADG with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer is required to achieve optimum proficiency.展开更多
Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has rapidly gained popularity due to the early detection of early gastric cancer. As advances in instruments and the accumulation of laparoscopic experience increase, lapa...Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has rapidly gained popularity due to the early detection of early gastric cancer. As advances in instruments and the accumulation of laparoscopic experience increase, laparoscopic techniques are being used for less invasive but highly technical procedures. Recent evidence suggests that the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer are comparable to those of conventional open surgery. However, these results should be confirmed by large-scale multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.展开更多
Minimally invasive surgery has become common in the surgical resection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors(SMTs). The purpose of this article is to review recent trends in minimally invasive surgery for gastric SMTs...Minimally invasive surgery has become common in the surgical resection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors(SMTs). The purpose of this article is to review recent trends in minimally invasive surgery for gastric SMTs. Although laparoscopic resection has been main stream of minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal SMTs, recent advances in endoscopic procedures now provide various treatment modalities for gastric SMTs. Moreover, investigators have developed several hybrid techniques that include the advantages of both laparoscopic and endoscopic procedure. In addition, several types of reduced port surgeries, modification of conventional laparoscopic procedures, have been recently applied to the surgical resection of SMTs. Meanwhile, robotic surgery for SMTs requires further evidence and improvement.展开更多
Gastric cancer is still a major cause of death worldwide.While laparoscopic gastrectomy(LG)has gained evidence as a standard treatment for early gastric cancer in the distal stomach,there are still concerns regarding ...Gastric cancer is still a major cause of death worldwide.While laparoscopic gastrectomy(LG)has gained evidence as a standard treatment for early gastric cancer in the distal stomach,there are still concerns regarding its application for gastric cancer in the upper stomach and advanced gastric cancer.Nevertheless,LG has shown to have faster recovery,shorter hospital stay,less pain,and less blood loss in many retrospective and prospective studies.The application of LG has now extended from conventional radical gastrectomy to novel approaches such as function-preserving gastrectomy and sentinel-node navigated surgery.Studies on the use of laparoscopy in treatment for stage IV gastric cancer are rare,but show that there may be some roles of LG in selected cases.With the development of new laparoscopic tools that augment human ability,the future of LG should move on from proving non-inferiority to demonstrating superiority compared to the traditional open gastrectomy.展开更多
AIM:To investigate the influence of the resection margin on local recurrence and survival in gastric cancer patients.METHODS:We reviewed the medical records of 1788patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric ca...AIM:To investigate the influence of the resection margin on local recurrence and survival in gastric cancer patients.METHODS:We reviewed the medical records of 1788patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,South Korea,between May 2003 and July 2009.The patients were divided into early and advanced gastric cancer groups.In each group,we analyzed the relationship between clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes,and compared the hazard rates of event occurrence between patients with resection margins above and below the cut-off value,using a Cox proportional hazard model.RESULTS:The early and advanced gastric cancer groups included 1001 and 787 patients,respectively.The hazard rates of event occurrence did not significantly differ between the patients with resection margins above the cut-off value and those with resection margins below the cut-off value(P>0.05,in all comparisons).Based on the multivariable analyses,the proximal and distal resection margins were not significantly associated with survival outcomes and local recurrence(P>0.05,in all analyses).CONCLUSION:The proximal or distal resection margins did not affect the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer if the margins were pathologically negative.展开更多
BACKGROUND Few studies have been conducted on sex differences in the incidence, pathophysiology, and prognosis of gastric cancer(GC).AIM To analyze the differences in GC characteristics according to sex in patients wh...BACKGROUND Few studies have been conducted on sex differences in the incidence, pathophysiology, and prognosis of gastric cancer(GC).AIM To analyze the differences in GC characteristics according to sex in patients who underwent surgical treatment for GC.METHODS A total of 2983 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who received surgical treatment at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2017 were included.Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, histologic type of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates, and associated risk factors were analyzed.RESULTS Among the 2983 patients, 2005(67.2%) and 978(32.8%) were males and females, respectively.The average age of the female group(59.36 years) was significantly younger than that of the male group(61.66 years;P < 0.001).Cancer of the gastric body(P < 0.001) and diffuse-type histology(P < 0.001) were more common in females than in males.This trend was more prominent in females younger than 60 years of age, with a significantly higher proportion of diffuse-type cancer than in the male group.Regardless of sex, diffuse-type GC was more common in younger patients, and the proportion of intestinal-type GC increased with age.The overall survival rate was significantly higher in females(P < 0.001).However, this difference disappeared for GC-specific survival(P = 0.168), except for the poor GC-specific survival rate in advanced-stage cancer(stage Ⅲ or above) in females(P = 0.045).The risk factors for GC-related mortality were older age, upper location of GC, and diffuse-or mixed-type histology.In terms of comorbidities, more males died from diseases other than GC, including other malignancies such as lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer, and respiratory diseases such as interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while there were relatively more cardiovascular or cerebrovascular deaths in females.CONCLUSION Sex-based differences in GC were observed in clinicopathological features, including age at diagnosis, tumor location, histologic type, survival rate, and comorbidities.展开更多
文摘StageⅣgastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide and is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths(1).Over the past few decades,advances in surgical techniques and chemotherapy have improved the prognosis for patients with gastric cancer.
文摘AIM: To evaluate the nature of the 'learning curve' for laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer. METHODS: The data of 90 consecutive patients with early gastric cancer who underwent LADG with systemic lymphadenectomy between April 2003 and November 2004 were reviewed. The 90 patients were divided into 9 sequential groups of 10 cases in each group and the average operative time of these 9 groups were determined. Other learning indicators, such as transfusion requirements, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complication, time to first flatus, and postoperative hospital stay, were evaluated. RESULTS: After the first 10 LADGs, the operative time reached its first plateau (230-240 min/operation) and then reached a second plateau (＜200 min/operation) for the final 30 cases. Although a significant improvement in the operative time was noted after the first 50 cases, there were no significant differences in transfusion requirements, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complications, time to first flatus, or postoperative hospital stay between the groups. CONCLUSION: Based on operative time analysis, this study show that experience of 50 cases of LADG with systemic lymphadenectomy for early gastric cancer is required to achieve optimum proficiency.
文摘Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer has rapidly gained popularity due to the early detection of early gastric cancer. As advances in instruments and the accumulation of laparoscopic experience increase, laparoscopic techniques are being used for less invasive but highly technical procedures. Recent evidence suggests that the short- and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer and advanced gastric cancer are comparable to those of conventional open surgery. However, these results should be confirmed by large-scale multicenter prospective randomized controlled clinical trials.
文摘Minimally invasive surgery has become common in the surgical resection of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors(SMTs). The purpose of this article is to review recent trends in minimally invasive surgery for gastric SMTs. Although laparoscopic resection has been main stream of minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal SMTs, recent advances in endoscopic procedures now provide various treatment modalities for gastric SMTs. Moreover, investigators have developed several hybrid techniques that include the advantages of both laparoscopic and endoscopic procedure. In addition, several types of reduced port surgeries, modification of conventional laparoscopic procedures, have been recently applied to the surgical resection of SMTs. Meanwhile, robotic surgery for SMTs requires further evidence and improvement.
文摘Gastric cancer is still a major cause of death worldwide.While laparoscopic gastrectomy(LG)has gained evidence as a standard treatment for early gastric cancer in the distal stomach,there are still concerns regarding its application for gastric cancer in the upper stomach and advanced gastric cancer.Nevertheless,LG has shown to have faster recovery,shorter hospital stay,less pain,and less blood loss in many retrospective and prospective studies.The application of LG has now extended from conventional radical gastrectomy to novel approaches such as function-preserving gastrectomy and sentinel-node navigated surgery.Studies on the use of laparoscopy in treatment for stage IV gastric cancer are rare,but show that there may be some roles of LG in selected cases.With the development of new laparoscopic tools that augment human ability,the future of LG should move on from proving non-inferiority to demonstrating superiority compared to the traditional open gastrectomy.
文摘AIM:To investigate the influence of the resection margin on local recurrence and survival in gastric cancer patients.METHODS:We reviewed the medical records of 1788patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital,South Korea,between May 2003 and July 2009.The patients were divided into early and advanced gastric cancer groups.In each group,we analyzed the relationship between clinicopathologic factors and survival outcomes,and compared the hazard rates of event occurrence between patients with resection margins above and below the cut-off value,using a Cox proportional hazard model.RESULTS:The early and advanced gastric cancer groups included 1001 and 787 patients,respectively.The hazard rates of event occurrence did not significantly differ between the patients with resection margins above the cut-off value and those with resection margins below the cut-off value(P>0.05,in all comparisons).Based on the multivariable analyses,the proximal and distal resection margins were not significantly associated with survival outcomes and local recurrence(P>0.05,in all analyses).CONCLUSION:The proximal or distal resection margins did not affect the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer if the margins were pathologically negative.
基金Supported by National Research Foundation of Korea
文摘BACKGROUND Few studies have been conducted on sex differences in the incidence, pathophysiology, and prognosis of gastric cancer(GC).AIM To analyze the differences in GC characteristics according to sex in patients who underwent surgical treatment for GC.METHODS A total of 2983 patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who received surgical treatment at the Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between 2003 and 2017 were included.Baseline clinicopathological characteristics, histologic type of GC, overall and GC-specific survival rates, and associated risk factors were analyzed.RESULTS Among the 2983 patients, 2005(67.2%) and 978(32.8%) were males and females, respectively.The average age of the female group(59.36 years) was significantly younger than that of the male group(61.66 years;P < 0.001).Cancer of the gastric body(P < 0.001) and diffuse-type histology(P < 0.001) were more common in females than in males.This trend was more prominent in females younger than 60 years of age, with a significantly higher proportion of diffuse-type cancer than in the male group.Regardless of sex, diffuse-type GC was more common in younger patients, and the proportion of intestinal-type GC increased with age.The overall survival rate was significantly higher in females(P < 0.001).However, this difference disappeared for GC-specific survival(P = 0.168), except for the poor GC-specific survival rate in advanced-stage cancer(stage Ⅲ or above) in females(P = 0.045).The risk factors for GC-related mortality were older age, upper location of GC, and diffuse-or mixed-type histology.In terms of comorbidities, more males died from diseases other than GC, including other malignancies such as lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and pancreatic cancer, and respiratory diseases such as interstitial lung disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, while there were relatively more cardiovascular or cerebrovascular deaths in females.CONCLUSION Sex-based differences in GC were observed in clinicopathological features, including age at diagnosis, tumor location, histologic type, survival rate, and comorbidities.
