AIM To evaluate the clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy(CLE) in the diagnosis and management of patients with an uncertain diagnosis.METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed.Patients who underwe...AIM To evaluate the clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy(CLE) in the diagnosis and management of patients with an uncertain diagnosis.METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed.Patients who underwent CLE between November 2013 and October 2015 and exhibited a poor correlation between endoscopic and histological findings were included.Baseline characteristics,indications,previous diagnostic studies,findings at the time of CLE,clinical management and histological results were analyzed.Interventions based on CLE findings were also analyzed.We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CLE and target biopsies of surgical specimens.RESULTS A total of 144 patients were included.Of these,51%(74/144) were female.The mean age was 51 years old.In all,41/144(28.4%) lesions were neoplastic(13 bile duct,10 gastric,8 esophageal,6 colonic,1 duodenal,1 rectal,1 ampulloma and 1 pancreatic).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and observed agreement when CLE was used to detect N-lesions were 85.37%,87.38%,72.92%,93.75% and 86.81%,respectively.Cohen's Kappa was 69.20%,thus indicating good agreement.Changes in management were observed in 54% of the cases.CONCLUSION CLE is a new diagnostic tool that has a significant clinical impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with uncertain diagnosis.展开更多
BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)can detect small lesions throughout the digestive tract;however,it remains challenging to accurately identify malignancies with this approach.EUS elastography measures tissue hardn...BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)can detect small lesions throughout the digestive tract;however,it remains challenging to accurately identify malignancies with this approach.EUS elastography measures tissue hardness,by which malignant and nonmalignant pancreatic masses(PMs)and lymph nodes(LNs)can be differentiated.However,there is currently little information regarding the strain ratio(SR)cutoff in Hispanic populations.AIM To determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS elastography for PMs and LNs with an SR cutoff value in Hispanics.METHODS A retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS elastography for PMs between December 2013 and December 2014.A qualitative(analysis of color maps)and quantitative(SR)analysis of PMs and their associated LNs was performed.The accuracy of EUS elastography in identifying malignant PMs and LNs and cutoff value for SR were analyzed.A PM and/or its associated LNs were considered malignant based on histopathological findings from fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples.RESULTS A sample of 121 patients was included,45.4%of whom were female.69(57.0%)PMs were histologically malignant,with a median SR of 50.4 vs 33.0 for malignant vs nonmalignant masses(P<0.001).EUS evaluation identified associated LNs in 43/121 patients(35.5%),in whom 22/43(51.2%)patients had histologically confirmed malignant diagnosis,with a median SR of 30 vs 40 for malignant vs nonmalignant LNs(P=0.7182).In detecting malignancy in PMs,an SR cutoff value of>21.5 yielded a sensitivity of 94.2%,while a cutoff value of>121 yielded a specificity of 96.2.2%.There were significant differences in the Giovannini scores,a previously established elastic score system,between the patients grouped by their final histology results(P<0.001).For LNs,SR cutoff values of>14.0 and>155 yielded a sensitivity of 90.9%and a specificity of 95.2%,respectively,in detecting malignancy.CONCLUSION EUS elastography is a helpful technique for the diagnosis of solid PMs and their associated LNs.The proposed SR cutoff values have a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of malignancy.展开更多
文摘AIM To evaluate the clinical impact of confocal laser endomicroscopy(CLE) in the diagnosis and management of patients with an uncertain diagnosis.METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed.Patients who underwent CLE between November 2013 and October 2015 and exhibited a poor correlation between endoscopic and histological findings were included.Baseline characteristics,indications,previous diagnostic studies,findings at the time of CLE,clinical management and histological results were analyzed.Interventions based on CLE findings were also analyzed.We compared the diagnostic accuracy of CLE and target biopsies of surgical specimens.RESULTS A total of 144 patients were included.Of these,51%(74/144) were female.The mean age was 51 years old.In all,41/144(28.4%) lesions were neoplastic(13 bile duct,10 gastric,8 esophageal,6 colonic,1 duodenal,1 rectal,1 ampulloma and 1 pancreatic).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value,and observed agreement when CLE was used to detect N-lesions were 85.37%,87.38%,72.92%,93.75% and 86.81%,respectively.Cohen's Kappa was 69.20%,thus indicating good agreement.Changes in management were observed in 54% of the cases.CONCLUSION CLE is a new diagnostic tool that has a significant clinical impact on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with uncertain diagnosis.
文摘BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)can detect small lesions throughout the digestive tract;however,it remains challenging to accurately identify malignancies with this approach.EUS elastography measures tissue hardness,by which malignant and nonmalignant pancreatic masses(PMs)and lymph nodes(LNs)can be differentiated.However,there is currently little information regarding the strain ratio(SR)cutoff in Hispanic populations.AIM To determine the diagnostic accuracy of EUS elastography for PMs and LNs with an SR cutoff value in Hispanics.METHODS A retrospective study of patients who underwent EUS elastography for PMs between December 2013 and December 2014.A qualitative(analysis of color maps)and quantitative(SR)analysis of PMs and their associated LNs was performed.The accuracy of EUS elastography in identifying malignant PMs and LNs and cutoff value for SR were analyzed.A PM and/or its associated LNs were considered malignant based on histopathological findings from fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples.RESULTS A sample of 121 patients was included,45.4%of whom were female.69(57.0%)PMs were histologically malignant,with a median SR of 50.4 vs 33.0 for malignant vs nonmalignant masses(P<0.001).EUS evaluation identified associated LNs in 43/121 patients(35.5%),in whom 22/43(51.2%)patients had histologically confirmed malignant diagnosis,with a median SR of 30 vs 40 for malignant vs nonmalignant LNs(P=0.7182).In detecting malignancy in PMs,an SR cutoff value of>21.5 yielded a sensitivity of 94.2%,while a cutoff value of>121 yielded a specificity of 96.2.2%.There were significant differences in the Giovannini scores,a previously established elastic score system,between the patients grouped by their final histology results(P<0.001).For LNs,SR cutoff values of>14.0 and>155 yielded a sensitivity of 90.9%and a specificity of 95.2%,respectively,in detecting malignancy.CONCLUSION EUS elastography is a helpful technique for the diagnosis of solid PMs and their associated LNs.The proposed SR cutoff values have a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of malignancy.
