Aim:Free tissue transfer is essential for extremity reconstruction following traumatic injuries,oncologic resection,and diabetic complications.However,given the circumferential shape of the arm and leg,a small amount ...Aim:Free tissue transfer is essential for extremity reconstruction following traumatic injuries,oncologic resection,and diabetic complications.However,given the circumferential shape of the arm and leg,a small amount of ongoing edema can prevent a tension-free closure.Additionally,intraoperative thrombosis,vascular disease can lead to proximal exposure of the pedicle or vein grafts.This study evaluates the outcomes of microvascular transfers that utilized a skin graft for closure over the pedicle,in comparison with a matched cohort with a tension-free primary closure.Methods:A retrospective review was completed of all patients that underwent free flap reconstruction of an extremity defect from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single academic institution.Flaps that utilized skin grafting for closure were compared to those closed primarily.Adjunct operative procedures,demographics,and complications were evaluated.Results:A total of 71 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria.The 11 flaps in 10 patients underwent skin grafting over the pedicle.The two cohorts were comparable in age,gender,BMI,and co-morbidities,excluding renal disease which was present in 40%(n=4)of skin grafted group compared to 6.5%(n=4)in the primary closure group.Flap area,operative time,and anastomosis technique were comparable between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the rates of post-operative complications including partial flap loss,complete flap loss,infection.Mean follow up time in the skin grafting group was 14.2 months and 20.2 months for the primary closure group. ;Conclusion:As per the principal,a tension-free closure is paramount to preventing tissue complications including direct compression of a microvascular pedicle.However,with ongoing tissue edema skin grafting should be considered as a reliable technique to ensure both protection of the pedicle as well as prevention of direct compression without additional complications and comparable post-operative outcomes.展开更多
Approximately 75%experience phantom(PLP),residual(RLP),or general(GLP)limb pain following lower extremity amputation.Targeted muscle reinnervation(TMR)is a peripheral nerve transfer that reroutes amputated nerves to m...Approximately 75%experience phantom(PLP),residual(RLP),or general(GLP)limb pain following lower extremity amputation.Targeted muscle reinnervation(TMR)is a peripheral nerve transfer that reroutes amputated nerves to motor endplates that can prevent or treat limb pain.This systematic review summarizes pain outcomes following primary and secondary treatment of lower extremity PLP,RLP,and GLP.Primary literature review of three databases-PubMed,EMBASE,MEDLINE-were used for all articles related to TMR and lower extremity limb pain,querying the same keywords:“targeted muscle reinnervation”AND“pain”.Citations were then reviewed and eliminated if only upper extremities were studied or the study lacked pain outcomes.Citations were categorized as primary or secondary TMR.Pain outcomes,including Numerical Rating Scales(NRS)and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(PROMIS)Pain scores,were aggregated when appropriate.Ten studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria after formal review for a total of 431 extremities,of which 79.1%(n=341 limbs)were lower extremities.Average primary TMR PROMIS scores for PLP and RLP were lower than amputees without primary TMR.Average NRS scores and PROMIS Pain scores in secondary TMR demonstrated improvements in PLP,RLP,and GLP.Primary and Secondary TMR does prevent and improve PLP,RLP,and GLP;however,a minority of studies report quantifiable pain outcomes.All future TMR studies should include validated pain outcomes to better quantify the expected pain and quality of life improvements after lower extremity TMR.展开更多
I am honored to present the special edition"Advances in Microsurgery for Upper and Lower Extremity Reconstruction and Limb Preservation"for Plastic and Aesthetic Research.Herein,world-class experts describe ...I am honored to present the special edition"Advances in Microsurgery for Upper and Lower Extremity Reconstruction and Limb Preservation"for Plastic and Aesthetic Research.Herein,world-class experts describe their techniques for functional reconstruction and rehabilitation in extremity injuries and limb salvage.展开更多
AIM: There are limited reports in the United States demonstrating outcomes of primarily thinned fasciocutaneous flaps in the setting of critical limb ischemia, Charcot collapse and osteomyelitis. We hope to determine ...AIM: There are limited reports in the United States demonstrating outcomes of primarily thinned fasciocutaneous flaps in the setting of critical limb ischemia, Charcot collapse and osteomyelitis. We hope to determine patient and flap related outcomes in advanced lower extremity disease. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of fasciocutaneous free flaps of variable thickness for lower extremity salvage. Osteomyelitis and non-osteomyelitis patients were compared according to our primary outcome measures: functional ambulation, bone healing and complications to flap and patient. Subgroups with critical limb ischemia, Charcot collapse and diabetic foot were analyzed separately. Results: Fifty-nine patients underwent free flap reconstruction: osteomyelitis (n = 20, 34%), Charcot collapse (n = 22, 37%), and/or critical limb ischemia (n = 12, 20%). All patients underwent anterolateral thigh flaps tailored for defect-specific thicknesses: 17 superthin, 25 suprafascial, 17 subfascial. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of partial and complete flap loss (P = 1.000 and P = 0.108). Ninety-one percent of patients were ambulatory at follow up. Eighty-tive percent of individuals with osteomyelitis cleared their infection demonstrating radiographic bone healing. Two patients developed recalcitrant deep space infections ultimately requiring amputation. Subgroup analysis did not show any differences in flap related complications within the diabetic Charcot population. In multivariate regression, preoperative revascularization was independently associated with failure of limb salvage. ;Conclusion: Primarily thinned perforator flaps performed well in the setting of lower extremity limb salvage, critical limbischemia, osteomyelitis, and the Charcot foot - expanding their role in the armamentarium for lower extremity care.展开更多
文摘Aim:Free tissue transfer is essential for extremity reconstruction following traumatic injuries,oncologic resection,and diabetic complications.However,given the circumferential shape of the arm and leg,a small amount of ongoing edema can prevent a tension-free closure.Additionally,intraoperative thrombosis,vascular disease can lead to proximal exposure of the pedicle or vein grafts.This study evaluates the outcomes of microvascular transfers that utilized a skin graft for closure over the pedicle,in comparison with a matched cohort with a tension-free primary closure.Methods:A retrospective review was completed of all patients that underwent free flap reconstruction of an extremity defect from January 2014 to December 2017 at a single academic institution.Flaps that utilized skin grafting for closure were compared to those closed primarily.Adjunct operative procedures,demographics,and complications were evaluated.Results:A total of 71 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria.The 11 flaps in 10 patients underwent skin grafting over the pedicle.The two cohorts were comparable in age,gender,BMI,and co-morbidities,excluding renal disease which was present in 40%(n=4)of skin grafted group compared to 6.5%(n=4)in the primary closure group.Flap area,operative time,and anastomosis technique were comparable between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the rates of post-operative complications including partial flap loss,complete flap loss,infection.Mean follow up time in the skin grafting group was 14.2 months and 20.2 months for the primary closure group. ;Conclusion:As per the principal,a tension-free closure is paramount to preventing tissue complications including direct compression of a microvascular pedicle.However,with ongoing tissue edema skin grafting should be considered as a reliable technique to ensure both protection of the pedicle as well as prevention of direct compression without additional complications and comparable post-operative outcomes.
文摘Approximately 75%experience phantom(PLP),residual(RLP),or general(GLP)limb pain following lower extremity amputation.Targeted muscle reinnervation(TMR)is a peripheral nerve transfer that reroutes amputated nerves to motor endplates that can prevent or treat limb pain.This systematic review summarizes pain outcomes following primary and secondary treatment of lower extremity PLP,RLP,and GLP.Primary literature review of three databases-PubMed,EMBASE,MEDLINE-were used for all articles related to TMR and lower extremity limb pain,querying the same keywords:“targeted muscle reinnervation”AND“pain”.Citations were then reviewed and eliminated if only upper extremities were studied or the study lacked pain outcomes.Citations were categorized as primary or secondary TMR.Pain outcomes,including Numerical Rating Scales(NRS)and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System(PROMIS)Pain scores,were aggregated when appropriate.Ten studies met all inclusion and exclusion criteria after formal review for a total of 431 extremities,of which 79.1%(n=341 limbs)were lower extremities.Average primary TMR PROMIS scores for PLP and RLP were lower than amputees without primary TMR.Average NRS scores and PROMIS Pain scores in secondary TMR demonstrated improvements in PLP,RLP,and GLP.Primary and Secondary TMR does prevent and improve PLP,RLP,and GLP;however,a minority of studies report quantifiable pain outcomes.All future TMR studies should include validated pain outcomes to better quantify the expected pain and quality of life improvements after lower extremity TMR.
文摘I am honored to present the special edition"Advances in Microsurgery for Upper and Lower Extremity Reconstruction and Limb Preservation"for Plastic and Aesthetic Research.Herein,world-class experts describe their techniques for functional reconstruction and rehabilitation in extremity injuries and limb salvage.
文摘AIM: There are limited reports in the United States demonstrating outcomes of primarily thinned fasciocutaneous flaps in the setting of critical limb ischemia, Charcot collapse and osteomyelitis. We hope to determine patient and flap related outcomes in advanced lower extremity disease. Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective review of fasciocutaneous free flaps of variable thickness for lower extremity salvage. Osteomyelitis and non-osteomyelitis patients were compared according to our primary outcome measures: functional ambulation, bone healing and complications to flap and patient. Subgroups with critical limb ischemia, Charcot collapse and diabetic foot were analyzed separately. Results: Fifty-nine patients underwent free flap reconstruction: osteomyelitis (n = 20, 34%), Charcot collapse (n = 22, 37%), and/or critical limb ischemia (n = 12, 20%). All patients underwent anterolateral thigh flaps tailored for defect-specific thicknesses: 17 superthin, 25 suprafascial, 17 subfascial. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of partial and complete flap loss (P = 1.000 and P = 0.108). Ninety-one percent of patients were ambulatory at follow up. Eighty-tive percent of individuals with osteomyelitis cleared their infection demonstrating radiographic bone healing. Two patients developed recalcitrant deep space infections ultimately requiring amputation. Subgroup analysis did not show any differences in flap related complications within the diabetic Charcot population. In multivariate regression, preoperative revascularization was independently associated with failure of limb salvage. ;Conclusion: Primarily thinned perforator flaps performed well in the setting of lower extremity limb salvage, critical limbischemia, osteomyelitis, and the Charcot foot - expanding their role in the armamentarium for lower extremity care.
