Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the field of pancreatic surgery. However, there are few studies of robotic distal pancreatectomy(RDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDA...Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the field of pancreatic surgery. However, there are few studies of robotic distal pancreatectomy(RDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of RDP for PDAC. Methods: Patients who underwent RDP or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP) for PDAC between January 2015 and September 2020 were reviewed. Propensity score matching analyses were performed. Results: Of the 335 patients included in the study, 24 underwent RDP and 311 underwent LDP. A total of 21 RDP patients were matched 1:1 with LDP patients. RDP was associated with longer operative time(209.7 vs. 163.2 min;P = 0.003), lower open conversion rate(0% vs. 4.8%;P < 0.001), higher cost(15 722 vs. 12 699 dollars;P = 0.003), and a higher rate of achievement of an R0 resection margin(90.5% vs. 61.9%;P = 0.042). However, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C showed no significant intergroup difference(9.5% vs. 9.5%). The median disease-free survival(34.5 vs. 17.3 months;P = 0.588) and overall survival(37.7 vs. 21.9 months;P = 0.171) were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: RDP is associated with longer operative time, a higher cost of surgery, and a higher likelihood of achieving R0 margins than LDP.展开更多
BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC)is a serious disease with a poor prognosis.Only a minority of patients undergo surgery due to the advanced stage of the disease,and patients with early-stage disease,wh...BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC)is a serious disease with a poor prognosis.Only a minority of patients undergo surgery due to the advanced stage of the disease,and patients with early-stage disease,who are expected to have a better prognosis,often experience recurrence.Thus,it is important to identify the risk factors for early recurrence and to develop an adequate treatment plan.AIM To evaluate the predictive factors associated with the early recurrence of earlystage PDAC.METHODS This study enrolled 407 patients with stage I PDAC undergoing upfront surgical resection between January 2000 and April 2016.Early recurrence was defined as a diagnosis of recurrence within 6 mo of surgery.The optimal cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analyses.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for early recurrence.RESULTS Of the 407 patients,98 patients(24.1%)experienced early disease recurrence:26(26.5%)local and 72(73.5%)distant sites.In total,253(62.2%)patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.On ROC curve analysis,the optimal cutoff values for early recurrence were 70 U/mL and 2.85 cm for carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9)levels and tumor size,respectively.Of the 181 patients with CA 19-9 level>70 U/mL,59(32.6%)had early recurrence,compared to 39(17.4%)of 226 patients with CA 19-9 level≤70 U/mL(P<0.001).Multivariate analysis revealed that CA 19-9 level>70 U/mL(P=0.006),tumor size>2.85 cm(P=0.004),poor differentiation(P=0.008),and non-adjuvant chemotherapy(P=0.025)were significant risk factors for early recurrence in early-stage PDAC.CONCLUSION Elevated CA 19-9 level(cutoff value>70 U/mL)can be a reliable predictive factor for early recurrence in early-stage PDAC.As adjuvant chemotherapy can prevent early recurrence,it should be recommended for patients susceptible to early recurrence.展开更多
BACKGROUND The microsatellite instability(MSI)test and immunohistochemistry(IHC)are widely used to screen DNA mismatch repair(MMR)deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer(CRC).For IHC,a two-antibody panel of MLH1 and ...BACKGROUND The microsatellite instability(MSI)test and immunohistochemistry(IHC)are widely used to screen DNA mismatch repair(MMR)deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer(CRC).For IHC,a two-antibody panel of MLH1 and MSH2 or four-antibody panel of MLH1,MSH2,PMS2,and MSH6 are used.In general,MSI is known as a more accurate screening test than IHC.AIM To compare two-and four-antibody panels of IHC in terms of accuracy and cost benefit on the basis of MSI testing for detecting MMR deficiency.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2015 and 2017 at a tertiary referral center.Both IHC with four antibodies and MSI tests were routinely performed.The sensitivity and specificity of a fourand two types of two-antibody panels(PMS2/MSH6 and MLH1/MSH2)were compared on the basis of MSI testing for detecting MMR deficiency.RESULTS High-frequency MSI was found in 5.5%(n=193)of the patients(n=3486).The sensitivities of the four-and two types of two-antibody panels were 97.4%,92.2%,and 87.6%,respectively.The specificities of the three types of panels did not differ significantly(99.6%for the four-antibody and PMS2/MSH6 panels,99.7%for the MLH1/MSH2 panel).Based on Cohen's kappa statistic(κ),four-and twoantibody panels were in almost perfect agreement with the MSI test(κ>0.9).The costs of the MSI test and the four-and two-antibody panels of IHC were approximately$200,$160,and$80,respectively.CONCLUSION Considering the cost of the four-antibody panel IHC compared to that of the twoantibody panel IHC,a two-antibody panel of PMS2/MSH6 might be the best choice in terms of balancing cost-effectiveness and accuracy.展开更多
Dear Editor,Anoxic brain injury(ABI)is a devastating event caused by cardiac arrest,chemical exposure,or trauma.Despite recent advances in medical diagnostic techniques and treatments,the survival rate after ABI is st...Dear Editor,Anoxic brain injury(ABI)is a devastating event caused by cardiac arrest,chemical exposure,or trauma.Despite recent advances in medical diagnostic techniques and treatments,the survival rate after ABI is still very low.Previous studies have reported that 52.6%-64.0%of people who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation after nontraumatic cardiac arrest die,and 9.0%-18.6%remain in a permanent vegetative state within 28 days of treatment[1,2].展开更多
文摘Background: Minimally invasive surgery is becoming increasingly popular in the field of pancreatic surgery. However, there are few studies of robotic distal pancreatectomy(RDP) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and feasibility of RDP for PDAC. Methods: Patients who underwent RDP or laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy(LDP) for PDAC between January 2015 and September 2020 were reviewed. Propensity score matching analyses were performed. Results: Of the 335 patients included in the study, 24 underwent RDP and 311 underwent LDP. A total of 21 RDP patients were matched 1:1 with LDP patients. RDP was associated with longer operative time(209.7 vs. 163.2 min;P = 0.003), lower open conversion rate(0% vs. 4.8%;P < 0.001), higher cost(15 722 vs. 12 699 dollars;P = 0.003), and a higher rate of achievement of an R0 resection margin(90.5% vs. 61.9%;P = 0.042). However, postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B or C showed no significant intergroup difference(9.5% vs. 9.5%). The median disease-free survival(34.5 vs. 17.3 months;P = 0.588) and overall survival(37.7 vs. 21.9 months;P = 0.171) were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: RDP is associated with longer operative time, a higher cost of surgery, and a higher likelihood of achieving R0 margins than LDP.
文摘BACKGROUND Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC)is a serious disease with a poor prognosis.Only a minority of patients undergo surgery due to the advanced stage of the disease,and patients with early-stage disease,who are expected to have a better prognosis,often experience recurrence.Thus,it is important to identify the risk factors for early recurrence and to develop an adequate treatment plan.AIM To evaluate the predictive factors associated with the early recurrence of earlystage PDAC.METHODS This study enrolled 407 patients with stage I PDAC undergoing upfront surgical resection between January 2000 and April 2016.Early recurrence was defined as a diagnosis of recurrence within 6 mo of surgery.The optimal cutoff values were determined by receiver operating characteristic(ROC)analyses.Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for early recurrence.RESULTS Of the 407 patients,98 patients(24.1%)experienced early disease recurrence:26(26.5%)local and 72(73.5%)distant sites.In total,253(62.2%)patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.On ROC curve analysis,the optimal cutoff values for early recurrence were 70 U/mL and 2.85 cm for carbohydrate antigen 19-9(CA 19-9)levels and tumor size,respectively.Of the 181 patients with CA 19-9 level>70 U/mL,59(32.6%)had early recurrence,compared to 39(17.4%)of 226 patients with CA 19-9 level≤70 U/mL(P<0.001).Multivariate analysis revealed that CA 19-9 level>70 U/mL(P=0.006),tumor size>2.85 cm(P=0.004),poor differentiation(P=0.008),and non-adjuvant chemotherapy(P=0.025)were significant risk factors for early recurrence in early-stage PDAC.CONCLUSION Elevated CA 19-9 level(cutoff value>70 U/mL)can be a reliable predictive factor for early recurrence in early-stage PDAC.As adjuvant chemotherapy can prevent early recurrence,it should be recommended for patients susceptible to early recurrence.
基金the Asan Institute for Life Sciences,Asan Medical Center,Seoul,South Korea,No.2020IP0039.
文摘BACKGROUND The microsatellite instability(MSI)test and immunohistochemistry(IHC)are widely used to screen DNA mismatch repair(MMR)deficiency in sporadic colorectal cancer(CRC).For IHC,a two-antibody panel of MLH1 and MSH2 or four-antibody panel of MLH1,MSH2,PMS2,and MSH6 are used.In general,MSI is known as a more accurate screening test than IHC.AIM To compare two-and four-antibody panels of IHC in terms of accuracy and cost benefit on the basis of MSI testing for detecting MMR deficiency.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed patients with CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2015 and 2017 at a tertiary referral center.Both IHC with four antibodies and MSI tests were routinely performed.The sensitivity and specificity of a fourand two types of two-antibody panels(PMS2/MSH6 and MLH1/MSH2)were compared on the basis of MSI testing for detecting MMR deficiency.RESULTS High-frequency MSI was found in 5.5%(n=193)of the patients(n=3486).The sensitivities of the four-and two types of two-antibody panels were 97.4%,92.2%,and 87.6%,respectively.The specificities of the three types of panels did not differ significantly(99.6%for the four-antibody and PMS2/MSH6 panels,99.7%for the MLH1/MSH2 panel).Based on Cohen's kappa statistic(κ),four-and twoantibody panels were in almost perfect agreement with the MSI test(κ>0.9).The costs of the MSI test and the four-and two-antibody panels of IHC were approximately$200,$160,and$80,respectively.CONCLUSION Considering the cost of the four-antibody panel IHC compared to that of the twoantibody panel IHC,a two-antibody panel of PMS2/MSH6 might be the best choice in terms of balancing cost-effectiveness and accuracy.
基金supported by the Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2013R1A1A4A01013178)。
文摘Dear Editor,Anoxic brain injury(ABI)is a devastating event caused by cardiac arrest,chemical exposure,or trauma.Despite recent advances in medical diagnostic techniques and treatments,the survival rate after ABI is still very low.Previous studies have reported that 52.6%-64.0%of people who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation after nontraumatic cardiac arrest die,and 9.0%-18.6%remain in a permanent vegetative state within 28 days of treatment[1,2].
