BACKGROUND Rectal cancer ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,necessitating surgical resection as the sole treatment option.Over the years,there has been a growing adoption of minima...BACKGROUND Rectal cancer ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,necessitating surgical resection as the sole treatment option.Over the years,there has been a growing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techni-ques such as robotic and laparoscopic approaches.Robotic surgery represents an innovative modality that effectively addresses the limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic techniques.While previous studies have reported favo-rable perioperative outcomes for robot-assisted radical resection in rectal cancer patients,further evidence regarding its oncological safety is still warranted.AIM To conduct a comparative analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection(LALAR)procedures.METHODS The clinical data of 125 patients who underwent robot-assisted low anterior resection(RALAR)and 279 patients who underwent LALAR resection at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from December 2019 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.After performing a 1:1 propensity score matching,the patients were divided into two groups:The RALAR group and the LALAR group(111 cases in each group).Subsequently,a comparison was made between the short-term outcomes within 30 d after surgery and the 3-year survival outcomes of these two groups.RESULTS Compared to the LALAR group,the RALAR group exhibited a significantly earlier time to first flatus[2(2-2)d vs 3(3-3)d,P=0.000],as well as a shorter time to first fluid diet[4(3-4)d vs 5(4-6)d,P=0.001].Additionally,the RALAR group demonstrated reduced postoperative indwelling catheter time[2(1-3)d vs 4(3-5)d,P=0.000]and decreased length of hospital stay after surgery[5(5-7)d vs 7(6-8)d,P=0.009].Moreover,there was an observed increase in total cost of hospitalization for the RALAR group compared to the LALAR group[10777(10780-11850)dollars vs 10550(8766-11715)dollars,P=0.012].No significant differences were found in terms of conversion rate to laparotomy or incidence of postoperative complications between both groups.Furthermore,no significant disparities were noted regarding the 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year disease-free survival rate between both groups.CONCLUSION Robotic surgery offers potential advantages in terms of accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal and urologic function compared to LALAR resection,while maintaining similar perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.展开更多
Gastric cancer(GC)is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death.The occurrence and development of GC is a complex process involving multiple biological mechanisms.Although traditional regulation modulates molecu...Gastric cancer(GC)is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death.The occurrence and development of GC is a complex process involving multiple biological mechanisms.Although traditional regulation modulates molecular functions related to the occurrence and development of GC,the comprehensive mechanisms remain unclear.Ultraconserved region(UCR)refers to a genome sequence that is completely conserved in the homologous regions of the human,rat and mouse genomes,with 100%identity,without any insertions or deletions,and often located in fragile sites and tumour-related genes.The transcribed UCR(T-UCR)is transcribed from the UCR and is a new type of long noncoding RNA.Recent studies have found that the expression level of T-UCRs changes during the occurrence and development of GC,revealing a new mechanism underlying GC.Therefore,this article aims to review the relevant research on T-UCRs in GC,as well as the function of T-UCRs and their regulatory role in the occurrence and development of GC,to provide new strategies for GC diagnosis and treatment.展开更多
基金Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81672379.
文摘BACKGROUND Rectal cancer ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide,necessitating surgical resection as the sole treatment option.Over the years,there has been a growing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techni-ques such as robotic and laparoscopic approaches.Robotic surgery represents an innovative modality that effectively addresses the limitations associated with traditional laparoscopic techniques.While previous studies have reported favo-rable perioperative outcomes for robot-assisted radical resection in rectal cancer patients,further evidence regarding its oncological safety is still warranted.AIM To conduct a comparative analysis of perioperative and oncological outcomes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic-assisted low anterior resection(LALAR)procedures.METHODS The clinical data of 125 patients who underwent robot-assisted low anterior resection(RALAR)and 279 patients who underwent LALAR resection at Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University from December 2019 to November 2022 were retrospectively analyzed.After performing a 1:1 propensity score matching,the patients were divided into two groups:The RALAR group and the LALAR group(111 cases in each group).Subsequently,a comparison was made between the short-term outcomes within 30 d after surgery and the 3-year survival outcomes of these two groups.RESULTS Compared to the LALAR group,the RALAR group exhibited a significantly earlier time to first flatus[2(2-2)d vs 3(3-3)d,P=0.000],as well as a shorter time to first fluid diet[4(3-4)d vs 5(4-6)d,P=0.001].Additionally,the RALAR group demonstrated reduced postoperative indwelling catheter time[2(1-3)d vs 4(3-5)d,P=0.000]and decreased length of hospital stay after surgery[5(5-7)d vs 7(6-8)d,P=0.009].Moreover,there was an observed increase in total cost of hospitalization for the RALAR group compared to the LALAR group[10777(10780-11850)dollars vs 10550(8766-11715)dollars,P=0.012].No significant differences were found in terms of conversion rate to laparotomy or incidence of postoperative complications between both groups.Furthermore,no significant disparities were noted regarding the 3-year overall survival rate and 3-year disease-free survival rate between both groups.CONCLUSION Robotic surgery offers potential advantages in terms of accelerated recovery of gastrointestinal and urologic function compared to LALAR resection,while maintaining similar perioperative and 3-year oncological outcomes.
基金Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China,No.81672379 and No.81101858Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province,China,No.ZR2016HM16.
文摘Gastric cancer(GC)is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death.The occurrence and development of GC is a complex process involving multiple biological mechanisms.Although traditional regulation modulates molecular functions related to the occurrence and development of GC,the comprehensive mechanisms remain unclear.Ultraconserved region(UCR)refers to a genome sequence that is completely conserved in the homologous regions of the human,rat and mouse genomes,with 100%identity,without any insertions or deletions,and often located in fragile sites and tumour-related genes.The transcribed UCR(T-UCR)is transcribed from the UCR and is a new type of long noncoding RNA.Recent studies have found that the expression level of T-UCRs changes during the occurrence and development of GC,revealing a new mechanism underlying GC.Therefore,this article aims to review the relevant research on T-UCRs in GC,as well as the function of T-UCRs and their regulatory role in the occurrence and development of GC,to provide new strategies for GC diagnosis and treatment.
