AIM: To determine risk factors associated with hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment failure after direct acting antivirals in patients with complex treatment histories.METHODS: All HCV mono-infected patients who received ...AIM: To determine risk factors associated with hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment failure after direct acting antivirals in patients with complex treatment histories.METHODS: All HCV mono-infected patients who received treatment at our institution were queried.Analysis was restricted to patients who previously failed treatment with boceprevir(BOC) or telaprevir(TVR) and started simeprevir(SMV) and sofosbuvir(SOF) ± ribavirin(RBV) between December 2013 and June 2014. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/HCV co-infection or patients who received a liver transplant in the past were excluded. Viral loads were recorded while on treatment and after treatment. Data collection continued until December,31 st 2014 when data analysis was initiated. Patients missing virologic outcomes data were not included in the analysis. Analysis of 35 patients who had virologic outcome data available resulted in eight patients who were viral load negative at the end of treatment with SMF/SOF but later relapsed. Data related to patient demographics,HCV infection,and treatment history was collected in order to identify risk factors shared among patients who failed treatment with SMF/SOF.RESULTS: Eight patients who were treated with the first generation HCV protease inhibitors BOC or TVR in combination with pegylated-interferon(PEG) and RBV who failed this triple therapy were subsequently retreated with an off-label all-oral regimen of SMV and SOF for 12 wk,with RBV in seven cases. Treatment was initiated before the Food and Drug Administration approved a 24-wk SMV/SOF regimen for patients with liver cirrhosis. All eight patients had an end of treatment response,but later relapsed. Eight(100%) patients were male. Mean age was 56(range,49-64). Eight(100%) patients had previously failed PEG/RBV dual therapy at least once in addition to prior failure with triple therapy. Total number of times treated ranged from 3-6(mean 3.8). Eight(100%) patients were male had liver cirrhosis as determined by Fibroscan or MRI. Seven(87.5%) patients had genotype 1a HCV. Seven(87.5%) patients had over 1 million IU/m L HCV RNA at the time of re-treatment.CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with SMV/SOF treatment failure and provides evidence that twleve weeks of SMV/SOF/RBV is insufficient in cirrhotics with high-titer genotype 1a HCV.展开更多
AIM To assess the real-world effectiveness and cost of simeprevir(SMV), and/or sofosbuvir(SOF)-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection.METHODS The real-world performance of patients treated with SMV...AIM To assess the real-world effectiveness and cost of simeprevir(SMV), and/or sofosbuvir(SOF)-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection.METHODS The real-world performance of patients treated with SMV/SOF ± ribavirin(RBV), SOF/RBV, and SOF/RBV with pegylated-interferon(PEG) were analyzed in a consecutive series of 508 patients with chronic HCV infection treated at a single academic medical center. Patients with genotypes 1 through 4 were included. Rates of sustained virological response-the absence of a detectable serum HCV RNA 12 wk after the end of treatment [sustained virological response(SVR) 12]-were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. Costs were calculated from the payer's perspective using Medicare/Medicaid fees and Redbook Wholesale Acquisition Costs. Patient-related factors associated with SVR12 were identified using multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS SVR 12 rates were as follows: 86%(95%CI: 80%-91%)among 178 patients on SMV/SOF ± RBV; 62%(95%CI: 55%-68%) among 234 patients on SOF/RBV; and 78%(95%CI: 68%-86%) among 96 patients on SOF/PEG/RBV. Mean costs-per-SVR 12 were $174442(standard deviation: ± $18588) for SMV/SOF ± RBV; $223003(± $77946) for SOF/RBV; and $126496(± $31052) for SOF/PEG/RBV. Among patients on SMV/SOF ± RBV, SVR12 was less likely in patients previously treated with a protease inhibitor [odds ratio(OR): 0.20, 95%CI: 0.06-0.56]. Higher bilirubin(OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30-0.69) reduced the likelihood of SVR12 among patients on SOF/RBV, while FIB-4 score ≥ 3.25 reduced the likelihood of SVR 12(OR: 0.18, 95%CI: 0.05-0.59) among those on SOF/PEG/RBV. CONCLUSION SVR 12 rates for SMV and/or SOF-based regimens in a diverse real-world population are comparable to those in clinical trials. Treatment failure accounts for 27% of costs.展开更多
基金Supported by The Grants No.R01 DK090317 and No.R01 DA031095(in part)
文摘AIM: To determine risk factors associated with hepatitis C virus(HCV) treatment failure after direct acting antivirals in patients with complex treatment histories.METHODS: All HCV mono-infected patients who received treatment at our institution were queried.Analysis was restricted to patients who previously failed treatment with boceprevir(BOC) or telaprevir(TVR) and started simeprevir(SMV) and sofosbuvir(SOF) ± ribavirin(RBV) between December 2013 and June 2014. Patients with human immunodeficiency virus(HIV)/HCV co-infection or patients who received a liver transplant in the past were excluded. Viral loads were recorded while on treatment and after treatment. Data collection continued until December,31 st 2014 when data analysis was initiated. Patients missing virologic outcomes data were not included in the analysis. Analysis of 35 patients who had virologic outcome data available resulted in eight patients who were viral load negative at the end of treatment with SMF/SOF but later relapsed. Data related to patient demographics,HCV infection,and treatment history was collected in order to identify risk factors shared among patients who failed treatment with SMF/SOF.RESULTS: Eight patients who were treated with the first generation HCV protease inhibitors BOC or TVR in combination with pegylated-interferon(PEG) and RBV who failed this triple therapy were subsequently retreated with an off-label all-oral regimen of SMV and SOF for 12 wk,with RBV in seven cases. Treatment was initiated before the Food and Drug Administration approved a 24-wk SMV/SOF regimen for patients with liver cirrhosis. All eight patients had an end of treatment response,but later relapsed. Eight(100%) patients were male. Mean age was 56(range,49-64). Eight(100%) patients had previously failed PEG/RBV dual therapy at least once in addition to prior failure with triple therapy. Total number of times treated ranged from 3-6(mean 3.8). Eight(100%) patients were male had liver cirrhosis as determined by Fibroscan or MRI. Seven(87.5%) patients had genotype 1a HCV. Seven(87.5%) patients had over 1 million IU/m L HCV RNA at the time of re-treatment.CONCLUSION: This study identifies factors associated with SMV/SOF treatment failure and provides evidence that twleve weeks of SMV/SOF/RBV is insufficient in cirrhotics with high-titer genotype 1a HCV.
基金Supported by Janssen Scientific Affairs and National Institutes of Health,Nos.DA031095 and DK090317
文摘AIM To assess the real-world effectiveness and cost of simeprevir(SMV), and/or sofosbuvir(SOF)-based therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus(HCV) infection.METHODS The real-world performance of patients treated with SMV/SOF ± ribavirin(RBV), SOF/RBV, and SOF/RBV with pegylated-interferon(PEG) were analyzed in a consecutive series of 508 patients with chronic HCV infection treated at a single academic medical center. Patients with genotypes 1 through 4 were included. Rates of sustained virological response-the absence of a detectable serum HCV RNA 12 wk after the end of treatment [sustained virological response(SVR) 12]-were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. Costs were calculated from the payer's perspective using Medicare/Medicaid fees and Redbook Wholesale Acquisition Costs. Patient-related factors associated with SVR12 were identified using multivariable logistic regression.RESULTS SVR 12 rates were as follows: 86%(95%CI: 80%-91%)among 178 patients on SMV/SOF ± RBV; 62%(95%CI: 55%-68%) among 234 patients on SOF/RBV; and 78%(95%CI: 68%-86%) among 96 patients on SOF/PEG/RBV. Mean costs-per-SVR 12 were $174442(standard deviation: ± $18588) for SMV/SOF ± RBV; $223003(± $77946) for SOF/RBV; and $126496(± $31052) for SOF/PEG/RBV. Among patients on SMV/SOF ± RBV, SVR12 was less likely in patients previously treated with a protease inhibitor [odds ratio(OR): 0.20, 95%CI: 0.06-0.56]. Higher bilirubin(OR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.30-0.69) reduced the likelihood of SVR12 among patients on SOF/RBV, while FIB-4 score ≥ 3.25 reduced the likelihood of SVR 12(OR: 0.18, 95%CI: 0.05-0.59) among those on SOF/PEG/RBV. CONCLUSION SVR 12 rates for SMV and/or SOF-based regimens in a diverse real-world population are comparable to those in clinical trials. Treatment failure accounts for 27% of costs.
