Purpose： studying and analyzing the application effect of three dimensional （3D） laparoscopy m surgical operation. Method： We select 126 patients who were diagnosed celiac disease in our hospital between May 2015...Purpose： studying and analyzing the application effect of three dimensional （3D） laparoscopy m surgical operation. Method： We select 126 patients who were diagnosed celiac disease in our hospital between May 2015 and April 2016 as our research subjects. All of these patients have indications for laparoscopic surgery, and we divide them into two groups randomly （observation and control group）. While the observation group is treated by 3D laparoscopic operation system, and the control group is treated by 2D laparoscopic system. During the treatment ,we observe the operation time, intra-operative bleeding and hospitalization time between the two different methods. Result： During the operation, the operation time of observation is （135.5±23.84） minutes and intra-operative bleeding time is （130.2±20. 11） milliliters, which both them are significantly lower than control group （163.8±25.22）min, （146.3±27.42）ml. This difference is statistically significant （P 〈0.05）. On the other hand, there is no obvious difference between observation and conlrol about indwelling catheter time, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative exhaust time. For the observation, the datum were （2.3±0.31） d, （8.1±1. 32） d, （3.2±0.58） d and they were no statistical significance. Conclusion： Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, the image of 3D laparoscopic surgery is more clear and stereoscopic. What＇s more, operators can have a good command of it easily to shorten operation time, which avoid surgery vascular damage and reduce bleeding amounts to some extent. It is a good assistant for clinical use.展开更多
文摘Purpose： studying and analyzing the application effect of three dimensional （3D） laparoscopy m surgical operation. Method： We select 126 patients who were diagnosed celiac disease in our hospital between May 2015 and April 2016 as our research subjects. All of these patients have indications for laparoscopic surgery, and we divide them into two groups randomly （observation and control group）. While the observation group is treated by 3D laparoscopic operation system, and the control group is treated by 2D laparoscopic system. During the treatment ,we observe the operation time, intra-operative bleeding and hospitalization time between the two different methods. Result： During the operation, the operation time of observation is （135.5±23.84） minutes and intra-operative bleeding time is （130.2±20. 11） milliliters, which both them are significantly lower than control group （163.8±25.22）min, （146.3±27.42）ml. This difference is statistically significant （P 〈0.05）. On the other hand, there is no obvious difference between observation and conlrol about indwelling catheter time, postoperative hospitalization time and postoperative exhaust time. For the observation, the datum were （2.3±0.31） d, （8.1±1. 32） d, （3.2±0.58） d and they were no statistical significance. Conclusion： Compared with traditional laparoscopic surgery, the image of 3D laparoscopic surgery is more clear and stereoscopic. What＇s more, operators can have a good command of it easily to shorten operation time, which avoid surgery vascular damage and reduce bleeding amounts to some extent. It is a good assistant for clinical use.
