BACKGROUND In colorectal cancer, tumor deposits(TDs) are considered to be a prognostic factor in the current staging system, and are only considered in the absence of lymph node metastases(LNMs). However, this definit...BACKGROUND In colorectal cancer, tumor deposits(TDs) are considered to be a prognostic factor in the current staging system, and are only considered in the absence of lymph node metastases(LNMs). However, this definition and the subsequent prognostic value based on it is controversial, with various hypotheses. TDs may play an independent role when it comes to survival and addition of TDs to LNM count may predict the prognosis of patients more accurately.AIM To assess the prognostic impact of TDs and evaluate the effect of their addition to the LNM count.METHODS The patients are derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A prognostic analysis regarding impact of TDs on overall survival(OS) was performed using Cox regression model, and other covariates associating with OS were adjusted. The effect of addition of TDs to LNM count on N restaging was also evaluated. The subgroup analysis was performed to explore the different profile of risk factors between patients with and without TDs.RESULTS Overall, 103755 patients were enrolled with 14131(13.6%) TD-positive and 89624(86.4%) TD-negative tumors. TD-positive patients had worse prognosis compared with TD-negative patients, with 3-year OS rates of 47.3%(95%CI, 46.5%-48.1%) and 77.5%(95%CI, 77.2%-77.8%, P < 0.0001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, TDs were associated poorer OS(hazard ratio, 1.35;95%CI, 1.31-1.38;P < 0.0001). Among TD-positive patients, the number of TDs had a linear negative effect on disease-free survival and OS. After reclassifying patients by adding TDs to the LNM count, 885 of 19 965(4.4%) N1 patients were restaged as p N2, with worse outcomes than patients restaged as p N1(3-year OS rate: 78.5%, 95%CI, 77.9%-79.1% vs 63.2%, 95%CI, 60.1%-66.5%, respectively;P < 0.0001).CONCLUSION TDs are an independent prognostic factor for OS in colorectal cancer. The addition of TDs to LNM count improved the prognostic accuracy of tumor, node and metastasis staging.展开更多
Hemangiopericytoma is clinically rare and easily confused with meningioma.Right-sided aortic arch is also a rare disease of congenital cardiovascular variability.The intracranial hemangiopericytoma associated with the...Hemangiopericytoma is clinically rare and easily confused with meningioma.Right-sided aortic arch is also a rare disease of congenital cardiovascular variability.The intracranial hemangiopericytoma associated with the right-sided aortic arch has not been reported in the literature.We are here to register a case of right aortic arch concurrent with intracranial hemangiopericytoma;the patient was initially thought to be a simple meningioma,but he was eventually diagnosed as a hemangiopericytoma with right aortic arch and multiple intracranial vascular stenosis and malformation.Whether there was a genetic correlation between the two provides a potential research direction for us.Therefore,the diagnosis and treatment of some rare diseases should be a more comprehensive analysis and evaluation.Adequate examination and accurate diagnosis are crucial,which will directly affect the efficacy of surgery and the prognosis of patients.展开更多
基金Supported by the Scientific and Technological Project of Qinghai Province,China,No. 2015-ZJ-742。
文摘BACKGROUND In colorectal cancer, tumor deposits(TDs) are considered to be a prognostic factor in the current staging system, and are only considered in the absence of lymph node metastases(LNMs). However, this definition and the subsequent prognostic value based on it is controversial, with various hypotheses. TDs may play an independent role when it comes to survival and addition of TDs to LNM count may predict the prognosis of patients more accurately.AIM To assess the prognostic impact of TDs and evaluate the effect of their addition to the LNM count.METHODS The patients are derived from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. A prognostic analysis regarding impact of TDs on overall survival(OS) was performed using Cox regression model, and other covariates associating with OS were adjusted. The effect of addition of TDs to LNM count on N restaging was also evaluated. The subgroup analysis was performed to explore the different profile of risk factors between patients with and without TDs.RESULTS Overall, 103755 patients were enrolled with 14131(13.6%) TD-positive and 89624(86.4%) TD-negative tumors. TD-positive patients had worse prognosis compared with TD-negative patients, with 3-year OS rates of 47.3%(95%CI, 46.5%-48.1%) and 77.5%(95%CI, 77.2%-77.8%, P < 0.0001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, TDs were associated poorer OS(hazard ratio, 1.35;95%CI, 1.31-1.38;P < 0.0001). Among TD-positive patients, the number of TDs had a linear negative effect on disease-free survival and OS. After reclassifying patients by adding TDs to the LNM count, 885 of 19 965(4.4%) N1 patients were restaged as p N2, with worse outcomes than patients restaged as p N1(3-year OS rate: 78.5%, 95%CI, 77.9%-79.1% vs 63.2%, 95%CI, 60.1%-66.5%, respectively;P < 0.0001).CONCLUSION TDs are an independent prognostic factor for OS in colorectal cancer. The addition of TDs to LNM count improved the prognostic accuracy of tumor, node and metastasis staging.
文摘Hemangiopericytoma is clinically rare and easily confused with meningioma.Right-sided aortic arch is also a rare disease of congenital cardiovascular variability.The intracranial hemangiopericytoma associated with the right-sided aortic arch has not been reported in the literature.We are here to register a case of right aortic arch concurrent with intracranial hemangiopericytoma;the patient was initially thought to be a simple meningioma,but he was eventually diagnosed as a hemangiopericytoma with right aortic arch and multiple intracranial vascular stenosis and malformation.Whether there was a genetic correlation between the two provides a potential research direction for us.Therefore,the diagnosis and treatment of some rare diseases should be a more comprehensive analysis and evaluation.Adequate examination and accurate diagnosis are crucial,which will directly affect the efficacy of surgery and the prognosis of patients.
