BACKGROUND Rectal prolapse arises from benign etiology.When symptoms of internal intussusception mirror those of rectal prolapse,a misdiagnosis is possible,especially under limited clinical presentation.It is crucial ...BACKGROUND Rectal prolapse arises from benign etiology.When symptoms of internal intussusception mirror those of rectal prolapse,a misdiagnosis is possible,especially under limited clinical presentation.It is crucial to recognize and differentiate rectal prolapse from internal intussusception because the two diagnoses have different prognoses.Here,we describe a case of adult sigmoid intussusception presenting as rectal prolapse.CASE SUMMARY A 64-year-old woman with no known medical history visited a gastrointestinal outpatient department due to hard bloody stool defecation for 1 wk followed by constipation for 3 d.Colonoscopy revealed a huge polypoid ulcerated tumor at the sigmoid colon with lumen stenosis.The patient was admitted due to postprocedural dull abdominal pain.Due to failed colonoscopy reduction and stent insertion,the patient underwent sigmoid colon resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis,with the transverse colostomy pathological report showing adenocarcinoma,pT3N0M0.She recovered well from the operation and was discharged with regular outpatient clinic follow-up.CONCLUSION Presentation and manifestation of sigmoid intussusception may resemble that of rectal prolapse,necessitating careful observation due to distinct prognostic implications.展开更多
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence.Early recurrence(ER)is related to worse prognosis.To date,few observational studie...BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence.Early recurrence(ER)is related to worse prognosis.To date,few observational studies have reported on the analysis of rectal cancer.Hence,we reported on the timing and risk factors for the ER of resectable rectal cancer at our institute.AIM To analyze a cohort of patients with local and/or distant recurrence following the radical resection of the primary tumor.METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database from March 2011 to January 2021.Clinicopathological data at diagnosis,perioperative and postoperative data,and first recurrence were collected and analyzed.ER was defined via receiver operating characteristic curve.Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.RESULTS We included 131 patients.The optimal cut off value of recurrence-free survival(RFS)to differentiate between ER(n=55,41.9%)and late recurrence(LR)(n=76,58.1%)was 8 mo.The median post-recurrence survival(PRS)of ER and LR was 1.4 mo and 2.9 mo,respectively(P=0.008)but PRS was not strongly associated with RFS(R^(2)=0.04).Risk factors included age≥70 years[hazard ratio(HR)=1.752,P=0.047],preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy(HR=3.683,P<0.001),colostomy creation(HR=2.221,P=0.036),and length of stay>9 d(HR=0.441,P=0.006).CONCLUSION RFS of 8 mo was the optimal cut-off value.Although ER was not associated with PRS,it was still related to prognosis;thus,intense surveillance is recommended.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Rectal prolapse arises from benign etiology.When symptoms of internal intussusception mirror those of rectal prolapse,a misdiagnosis is possible,especially under limited clinical presentation.It is crucial to recognize and differentiate rectal prolapse from internal intussusception because the two diagnoses have different prognoses.Here,we describe a case of adult sigmoid intussusception presenting as rectal prolapse.CASE SUMMARY A 64-year-old woman with no known medical history visited a gastrointestinal outpatient department due to hard bloody stool defecation for 1 wk followed by constipation for 3 d.Colonoscopy revealed a huge polypoid ulcerated tumor at the sigmoid colon with lumen stenosis.The patient was admitted due to postprocedural dull abdominal pain.Due to failed colonoscopy reduction and stent insertion,the patient underwent sigmoid colon resection with primary end-to-end anastomosis,with the transverse colostomy pathological report showing adenocarcinoma,pT3N0M0.She recovered well from the operation and was discharged with regular outpatient clinic follow-up.CONCLUSION Presentation and manifestation of sigmoid intussusception may resemble that of rectal prolapse,necessitating careful observation due to distinct prognostic implications.
文摘BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy and various methods have been introduced to decrease the possibility of recurrence.Early recurrence(ER)is related to worse prognosis.To date,few observational studies have reported on the analysis of rectal cancer.Hence,we reported on the timing and risk factors for the ER of resectable rectal cancer at our institute.AIM To analyze a cohort of patients with local and/or distant recurrence following the radical resection of the primary tumor.METHODS Data were retrospectively collected from the institutional database from March 2011 to January 2021.Clinicopathological data at diagnosis,perioperative and postoperative data,and first recurrence were collected and analyzed.ER was defined via receiver operating characteristic curve.Prognostic factors were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.RESULTS We included 131 patients.The optimal cut off value of recurrence-free survival(RFS)to differentiate between ER(n=55,41.9%)and late recurrence(LR)(n=76,58.1%)was 8 mo.The median post-recurrence survival(PRS)of ER and LR was 1.4 mo and 2.9 mo,respectively(P=0.008)but PRS was not strongly associated with RFS(R^(2)=0.04).Risk factors included age≥70 years[hazard ratio(HR)=1.752,P=0.047],preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy(HR=3.683,P<0.001),colostomy creation(HR=2.221,P=0.036),and length of stay>9 d(HR=0.441,P=0.006).CONCLUSION RFS of 8 mo was the optimal cut-off value.Although ER was not associated with PRS,it was still related to prognosis;thus,intense surveillance is recommended.
