China＇s current academic evaluation system sees publications in core journals as a basic index to measure the academic qualification and quality of an academic institute,
Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To puri...Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To purify the academic atmosphere, cultivate the academic ecology, and promote academic innovation, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theoretical Research in the New Era. It put forward precise requirements and made specific deployments to improve the scientific research assessment and evaluation system, which pointed out the direction for reforming the academic evaluation system in legal studies. It is necessary to grasp the historical trend, take the initiative to seek changes, shoulder our responsibility, address pain points and difficulties in the academic research evaluation system in an innovative way, and build an academic evaluation system and academic evaluation institutions in line with the characteristics of the discipline of law and the needs of the times, thereby promoting the prosperous development of legal studies.展开更多
In academic evaluation, some composite evaluation indexes, for example, quantity, quality and prestige, have the advantages of a large amount of information and unique results. First, in this paper, two composite eval...In academic evaluation, some composite evaluation indexes, for example, quantity, quality and prestige, have the advantages of a large amount of information and unique results. First, in this paper, two composite evaluation indexes are proposed, i.e., the HR index and the CHR index,where the HR index is based on the evaluation of prestige and quality, and the CHR index is based on the evaluation of prestige, quality and quantity. Second, two methods are proposed for testing the HR and CHR indexes. One is to test the principles, i.e., the self-interpretation degree of the results to the principle, by means of partial least squares regression. The other is the analysis of the evaluation results, including the relationships between the composite index and other bibliometric indicators, such as the order of magnitude and distinction and the data distribution of evaluation value, etc. Empirical studies are also conducted. The CSSCI periodicals of the CNKI Library Information and Document Science are employed to test the proposed HR and CHR indexes. Empirical analyses find that the HR index and the CHR index are good evaluation indicators that have broad application and can be used in many aspects, such as scholar, institutional and subject evaluations.展开更多
The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplem...The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplementary perspective for citation analysis in three theoretical aspects, which are influence dimension, discipline difference and behavioral motive. Based on 166,767 articles in physics, computer science, economics, and Library and Information Science included by SCI and SSCI in 2013 as research samples, this paper conducts an exploratory investigation into the measurement features of the usage data. According to the results, compared with citation data, usage is more discriminative and sensitive. In terms of distribution, usage presents an approximate and positively skewed distribution at high-frequency. An approximate power-law distribution is observed in the cumulative integral. The evaluation result of usage is independent to a certain degree and poses no essential opposition to the result of citation. Although the usage of the Wo S platform still has the limitations of generality, falsifiability and isolation, usage may be accepted as one of the possible options that supplement citation data and provide a richer field of vision for influence evaluation. There are 4 figures, 6 tables and 23 references in this paper.展开更多
Based on the background of the special clean-up action of"Breaking the Five-only",this paper combs the relevant policies of domestic science and education evaluation.Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer scientific ...Based on the background of the special clean-up action of"Breaking the Five-only",this paper combs the relevant policies of domestic science and education evaluation.Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer scientific measurement software,this paper makes a visual analysis on the related domestic research of the"Five-only"and"science and education evaluation",and expounds the frontier hot spots and trends of science and education evaluation research in China.Based on this,this paper summarizes the countermeasures and suggestions on how to"break"the"Five-only"and how to"establish"the"new system of science and education evaluation",in order to provide a reference for the sustainable and healthy development of science and education evaluation in China.展开更多
文摘China＇s current academic evaluation system sees publications in core journals as a basic index to measure the academic qualification and quality of an academic institute,
文摘Academic evaluation is the baton and wind vane for academic development, and the establishment of a scientific and authoritative evaluation system is crucial to establishing a robust academic research ecology. To purify the academic atmosphere, cultivate the academic ecology, and promote academic innovation, the General Office of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the General Office of the State Council jointly issued the Opinions on Strengthening Legal Education and Legal Theoretical Research in the New Era. It put forward precise requirements and made specific deployments to improve the scientific research assessment and evaluation system, which pointed out the direction for reforming the academic evaluation system in legal studies. It is necessary to grasp the historical trend, take the initiative to seek changes, shoulder our responsibility, address pain points and difficulties in the academic research evaluation system in an innovative way, and build an academic evaluation system and academic evaluation institutions in line with the characteristics of the discipline of law and the needs of the times, thereby promoting the prosperous development of legal studies.
基金supported by the Humanities and Social Sciences projects of the Ministry of Education(17YJA630125)the Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province(17NDJC107YB)。
文摘In academic evaluation, some composite evaluation indexes, for example, quantity, quality and prestige, have the advantages of a large amount of information and unique results. First, in this paper, two composite evaluation indexes are proposed, i.e., the HR index and the CHR index,where the HR index is based on the evaluation of prestige and quality, and the CHR index is based on the evaluation of prestige, quality and quantity. Second, two methods are proposed for testing the HR and CHR indexes. One is to test the principles, i.e., the self-interpretation degree of the results to the principle, by means of partial least squares regression. The other is the analysis of the evaluation results, including the relationships between the composite index and other bibliometric indicators, such as the order of magnitude and distinction and the data distribution of evaluation value, etc. Empirical studies are also conducted. The CSSCI periodicals of the CNKI Library Information and Document Science are employed to test the proposed HR and CHR indexes. Empirical analyses find that the HR index and the CHR index are good evaluation indicators that have broad application and can be used in many aspects, such as scholar, institutional and subject evaluations.
基金the youth project“The Mechanism and Empirical Study of h-Type Information Network Measures”(No.71503083) supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China
文摘The emergence of new data has always been a major force driving the advance of informetrics. The magnitude of data usage for academic literature, given by the Web of Science(Wo S), can be expected to provide a supplementary perspective for citation analysis in three theoretical aspects, which are influence dimension, discipline difference and behavioral motive. Based on 166,767 articles in physics, computer science, economics, and Library and Information Science included by SCI and SSCI in 2013 as research samples, this paper conducts an exploratory investigation into the measurement features of the usage data. According to the results, compared with citation data, usage is more discriminative and sensitive. In terms of distribution, usage presents an approximate and positively skewed distribution at high-frequency. An approximate power-law distribution is observed in the cumulative integral. The evaluation result of usage is independent to a certain degree and poses no essential opposition to the result of citation. Although the usage of the Wo S platform still has the limitations of generality, falsifiability and isolation, usage may be accepted as one of the possible options that supplement citation data and provide a richer field of vision for influence evaluation. There are 4 figures, 6 tables and 23 references in this paper.
基金This research is supported by the Major Projects of the National Social Science Foundation of China,Research on the construction of science and education evaluation information cloud platform and intelligent service based on big data(Grant No.19ZDA348).
文摘Based on the background of the special clean-up action of"Breaking the Five-only",this paper combs the relevant policies of domestic science and education evaluation.Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer scientific measurement software,this paper makes a visual analysis on the related domestic research of the"Five-only"and"science and education evaluation",and expounds the frontier hot spots and trends of science and education evaluation research in China.Based on this,this paper summarizes the countermeasures and suggestions on how to"break"the"Five-only"and how to"establish"the"new system of science and education evaluation",in order to provide a reference for the sustainable and healthy development of science and education evaluation in China.
